ArticleBMC oral health2025
Clinically oriented automatic three-dimensional enamel segmentation via deep learning.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEstablishing accurate, reliable, and convenient methods for enamel segmentation and analysis is crucial for effectively planning endodontic, orthodontic, and restorative treatments, as well as exploring the evolutionary patterns of mammals. However, no mature, non-destructive method currently exists in clinical dentistry to quickly, accurately, and comprehensively assess the integrity and thickness of enamel chair-side. This study aims to develop a deep learning work, 2.5D Attention U-Net, trained on small sample datasets, for the automatical, efficient, and accurate segmentation of enamel across all teeth in clinical settings.
methodsWe propose a fully automated computer-aided enamel segmentation model based on an instance segmentation network, 2.5D Attention U-Net. After data annotation and augmentation, the model is trained using manually annotated segmented enamel data, and its performance is evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient metrics. A satisfactory image segmentation model is applied to generate a 3D enamel model for each tooth and to calculate the thickness value of individual enclosed 3D enamel meshes using a normal ray-tracing directional method.
resultsThe model achieves the Dice score on the enamel segmentation task of 96.6%. This study provides an intuitive visualization of irregular enamel morphology and a quantitative analysis of three-dimensional enamel thickness variations. The results indicate that enamel is thickest at the incisal edges of anterior teeth and the cusps of posterior teeth, thinning towards the roots. For posterior teeth, the enamel is thinnest at the central fossae area, with mandibular molars having thicker enamel in the central fossae compared to maxillary molars. The average enamel thickness of maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars is greater than that of mandibular incisors, while the opposite is true for molars. Although there are individual variations in enamel thickness, the average enamel thickness graduallly increases from the incisors to the molars among all teeth within the same quadrant.
conclusionsThis study introduces an automatic, efficient, and accurate 2.5D Attention U-Net system to enhance precise and efficient chair-side diagnosis and treatment of enamel-related diseases in clinical settings, marking a significant advancement in automated diagnostics for enamel-related conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.