ArticleBMC nursing2025
Nurse management of minor problems in primary care emergencies: a non-randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06298240 (The Implementation of Nurse Demand Management as a Factor in Improving the Quality of Care in a Primary Care Emergency Center.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Implementation of Nurse Demand Management as a Factor in Improving the Quality of Care in a Primary Care Emergency Center.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Definition of polyconsultant patients in primary health care using Data Science].Atencion primaria · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth systems must implement strategies to adapt to the high demand in primary care caused by social changes. Since 2009, the Catalan Institute of Health has been expanding the Nurse Demand Management programme through which nursing autonomously addresses minor health problems. This study aims to analyse whether this programme is a factor in improving the efficiency and quality of care in a primary care emergency centre. The results come from a non-randomised controlled experimental study that tested the implementation of the programme applied to an experimental group treated by nurses versus a control group treated by doctors. The study was approved on 14 July 2022 by the Research Ethics Committee of the Jordi Gol University Institute following the guidelines of the TREND statement.
resultsA total of 312 patients were included in the study, all of whom came to the emergency centre with five types of minor problems. Exactly half (156) were seen by nurses and half were seen by doctors. The experimental group had an average waiting time of 15.1 min and the control group 33.25 min. There was no significant difference in the assessment of the quality of care received and there were no differences in the total number of consultations for the same problem. There were fewer prescriptions given out by nurses, with an average of 1.79 medicines per participant versus 2.26 medicines prescribed by doctors. The results of the study suggest that the Nurse Demand Management programme was a factor in improving the efficiency and in the emergency centre. Nurse resolution capacity, after applying algorithms, offered quality care, with fewer prescriptions and good patient satisfaction without increasing the total number of consultations due to the same problem.
trial registrationThe protocol for the current study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, with identification NCT06298240, retrospectively registered February 29, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.