Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856624›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Polyploidization-driven transcriptomic dynamics in Medicago sativa neotetraploids: mRNA, smRNA and allele-specific gene expression.

D F Santoro, G Marconi, S Capomaccio, M Bocchini, A W Anderson, A Finotti, M Confalonieri, E Albertini, D Rosellini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Breeding jassid-resistant okra (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

D F SantoroDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, via Borgo XX giugno 74, Perugia, 06121, Italy.
G MarconiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, via Borgo XX giugno 74, Perugia, 06121, Italy.
S CapomaccioInteruniversity Consortium for Biotechnology (CIB), Area Science Park, Padriciano 99, Trieste, 34149, Italy.
M BocchiniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, via Borgo XX giugno 74, Perugia, 06121, Italy.
A W AndersonDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, via Borgo XX giugno 74, Perugia, 06121, Italy.
A FinottiInteruniversity Consortium for Biotechnology (CIB), Area Science Park, Padriciano 99, Trieste, 34149, Italy.
M ConfalonieriCREA Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture (CREA-ZA), Viale Piacenza 29, Lodi, 26900, Italy.
E AlbertiniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, via Borgo XX giugno 74, Perugia, 06121, Italy.
D RoselliniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, via Borgo XX giugno 74, Perugia, 06121, Italy. daniele.rosellini@unipg.it.

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca 2020HB9PR9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome duplication (WGD) is a powerful evolutionary mechanism in plants. Autopolyploids have been comparatively less studied than allopolyploids, with sexual autopolyploidization receiving even less attention. In this work, we studied the transcriptomes of neotetraploids (2n = 4x = 32) obtained by crossing two diploid (2n = 2x = 16) plants of Medicago sativa that produce a significant percentage of either 2n eggs or pollen. Diploid progeny from the same cross allowed us to separate the transcriptional outcomes of hybridization from those of WGD. This material can help to elucidate events at the base of the domestication of cultivated 4x alfalfa, the world's most important leguminous forage. Three 2x and three 4x progeny plants and 2x parental plants were used for this study. The RNA-seq data revealed that WGD did not dramatically affect the transcription of leaf protein-coding genes. The two parental genotypes did not contribute equally to the progeny transcriptomes, and genome-wide expression level dominance of the male parent was observed. A large majority of the genes whose expression level changed due to WGD presented increased expression, indicating that the 4x state requires the upregulation of approximately 2.66% of the protein-coding genes. Overall, we estimated that 3.63% of the protein-coding genes were transcriptionally affected by WGD and may contribute to the phenotypic novelty of the neotetraploid plants. Pathway analysis suggested that WGD could affect secondary metabolite biosynthesis, which in turn may influence forage quality. We found four times as many transcription factor genes among the polyploidization-affected genes than among those affected only by hybridization. Several of these belong to classes involved in stress response. Small RNA-seq revealed that very few miRNAs were significantly associated with WGD, but they target several hundred genes, and their role in the WGD response may be relevant. Integrated network analysis led to the identification of putative miRNA: mRNA interactions potentially involved in transcriptome reprogramming. Allele-specific expression analysis indicated that parent-of-origin bias was not a significant outcome of WGD, but we found that parentally biased RNA editing may be a significant source of variation in neopolyploids.

Indexed as

Medicago sativaPolyploidyTetraploidyTranscriptomeAllelesGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenome, PlantRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantAlfalfaExpression level dominanceGene coexpression networkRNA-SeqSexual polyploidizationSmall RNAWhole genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID39856624
PMCPMC11763150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.