ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Comparative magnetic resonance imaging-based study of pelvic floor morphology and function before pregnancy and after primigravida vaginal delivery.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pelvic Floor Workout for Preventing Stress Urinary Incontinence in Primiparous Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Biomechanical Model of the Levator Ani Muscle: Identifying the Greatest Strain Areas in Its Subdivisions.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVaginal childbirth is one of the main risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can facilitate quantitative evaluation of the morphology and function of the pelvic floor in static and dynamic environments. The objective of this study was to investigate the changes in pelvic floor morphology and function in primigravida women before pregnancy (BP) and after vaginal delivery.
methodsPrimigravida women underwent pelvic floor MRI scans BP, at 3 months postpartum (3mPP), and at 6 months postpartum (6mPP). Various pelvic floor MRI data were measured, including the obturator internus muscle (OIM) area, anterior pelvic area, puborectalis muscle thickness (PRT), levator plate angle (LPA), iliococcygeal angle, bladder-pubococcygeal line (B-PCL), uterus-pubococcygeal line (U-PCL), puborectal hiatus line, muscular pelvic floor relaxation line, levator hiatus area, urethral mobility, bladder neck descent, and cervix descent.
resultsIn the resting state, the OIM area and PRT decreased whereas the anterior pelvic area increased from BP to 3mPP. During the straining maneuver, all parameters except U-PCL and urethral mobility showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The OIM area and PRT increased whereas the anterior pelvic area decreased from 3mPP to 6mPP. During the straining maneuver, B-PCL, bladder neck descent, levator hiatus area, and LPA showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In the resting state, the OIM area and PRT decreased whereas the anterior pelvic area increased from BP to 6mPP. During the straining maneuver, B-PCL, muscular pelvic floor relaxation line, and bladder neck descent showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).
conclusionVaginal delivery can cause pelvic floor injury that may gradually recover over time. However, the injury does not fully recover to the pre-pregnancy level within 6mPP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.