ArticleBMC nursing2025
Perceptions of care and family support from patients and family caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a phenomenological study in Spain.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Companion Value Co-Creation and Well-Being in Older Adults with Chronic Illness: A Cross-Sectional Dyadic Study in Spain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Family engagement in intensive care: perceptions, barriers, and facilitators among nurses in Saudi Arabia.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- A qualitative study of differences in palliative care in hospitals and traditional home-based care in Cameroon.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 and throughout the health crisis, health authorities recommended restriction measures to minimize the risk of contagion and avoid the collapse of health centers. The restrictive health and safety measures conditioned the way in which patients were cared for, as well as their social and family life. The purpose of the study was to explore patients and caregivers' perception of family care and support during hospitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in a Manacor hospital.
methodFrom an interpretive phenomenological approach, data was collected through the first author's field diary and 30 semi-structured interviews with patients and family caregivers. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes, and rigor was achieved through multiple coding and systematic comparisons.
resultsThe findings underscore the profound emotional toll that restrictive visitation policies during the pandemic took on patients and their family caregivers. Limited family support led to feelings of loneliness, isolation, and emotional distress among patients, exacerbating their vulnerability. Participants highlighted the critical role of family presence in improving emotional stability and physical recovery, hinting at the importance of fostering psychological resilience in healthcare settings. Additionally, the study revealed inconsistencies in the communication and dissemination of information, which aggravated stress and confusion among participants. Clear, consistent, and empathetic communication strategies were considered essential for patient care and satisfaction. Participants expressed gratitude toward healthcare professionals and advocated for a person-centered approach that addresses not only clinical, but also emotional and psychological needs.
conclusionsThe study highlights the need to improve care for vulnerable populations, such as those at the end of life, to ensure dignified and compassionate care. It also points at the importance of post-discharge support for patients recovering from serious illnesses. The findings provide valuable information to improve person-centered care and the communication of future healthcare protocols amid health crises such as COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.