ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Evaluating the use of Uromune
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urinary Tract Infections: Molecular Determinants of Uropathogenicity and Their Translation into Contemporary Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Individualized Autovaccine Immunotherapy in Women With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections: A Prospective Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Implications for methenamine hippurate use in recurrent urinary tract infection management: Formaldehyde resistance and altered urinary composition.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Whole-genome characterisation of high-risk ST131 and the emerging ST1193 UPEC lineages in Romanian patients with recurrent urinary tract infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Harnessing pro-inflammatory and immunopathologic immune responses in urinary tract infections for vaccine development: it's all about a balance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Current Evidence on Safety, Efficacy and Efficiency of Sublingual Vaccine UromunePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence of the Effectiveness and Safety of Immunoprophylaxis Using Sublingual Dead Whole Bacteria to Prevent Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (rUTIs).Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Correlations Between Rheology, In Situ Mucosal Retention and In Vivo Immunogenicity Reveal the Potential and Limitations of Mucoadhesive Excipients for Sublingual Vaccine Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Autovaccine immunoprophylaxis in patients with neurogenic bladder experiencing recurrent urinary tract infections.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are a significant global health issue, especially among women, with growing concerns related to antibiotic resistance and adverse effects. The Uromune
methodsThis pilot retrospective study, conducted at Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan de Reus from January 2018 to August 2022, assessed the association between Uromune
resultsForty-nine patients (mean age, 61 years, and 59.2% women) were included in the study. Uromune
conclusionUromune
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.