ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Time to recovery of neonatal sepsis and its predictors in public hospitals of North Shoa Zone, Central Ethiopia.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for predicting neonatal bacterial infections: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Low-Middle Income Country: Impact of an Antibiotic Guideline for Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal sepsis remains one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality among neonates in developing countries. It can cause severe morbidities and sequelae, even though patients survive. Prolonged recovery time of neonatal sepsis leads to hospitalization, increased cost of treatments, antimicrobial resistance, disseminated intravascular coagulation, respiratory failure, septic shock, brain lesions, renal failure, and cardiovascular dysfunction, and eventually death. Thus, this study aimed to identify the time-to-recovery of neonatal sepsis and its predictors among newborns admitted to public hospitals in the North Shoa Zone, Central Ethiopia.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted among 508 septic neonates admitted to selected public hospitals in the North Shoa Zone between March 1, 2021, and March 1, 2023. A systematic random sampling method was used to select eligible medical records. The data were collected through the open data kit (ODK) Collect Android app and consequently exported to STATA version 17 for analysis. The data were analyzed using both univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. The adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was employed.
resultsOf all septic neonates, 441 were recovered. The predictors of time-to-recovery of neonatal sepsis were premature rupture of membrane (PROM) (AHR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.63), intrapartum fever (AHR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.75), chest-indrawing (AHR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.68), fifth-minute appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (Apgar) score less than seven (AHR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.77), gestational age between 37 and 42 weeks (AHR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.70), septic shock (AHR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.85).
conclusionThe median time to recovery from neonatal sepsis in this study was comparable to the previous studies. Premature rupture of membranes, intrapartum fever, term gestational age, low fifth minute Apgar score, chest indrawing, and septic shock were the predictors of time-to recovery of neonatal sepsis. Therefore, birth attendants are advised to closely adhere to the obstetrics management protocols when providing care for women who have intrapartum fever and premature rupture of membranes, as this will help to minimize neonatal sepsis and the subsequent delay in recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.