Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856559›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2025

Prevalence of dengue and leptospirosis coinfection and associated mortality rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Suraj Tiwari, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Rekha Mm, Mandeep Kaur, Girish Chandra Sharma, Puneet Sudan, K Satyam Naidu, Rajesh Singh, Teena Vishwakarma, Sonam Puri and 9 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Suraj Tiwari *Department of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Guwahati, 781101, India.
Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib *Division of Evidence Synthesis, Global Consortium of Public Health and Research, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education, Wardha, India.
Rekha MmDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Mandeep KaurDepartment of Allied Healthcare and Sciences, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303012, India.
Girish Chandra SharmaDepartment of Applied Sciences-Chemistry, NIMS Institute of Engineering & Technology, NIMS University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Puneet SudanDepartment of Pharmacy Chandigarh Pharmacy College, Chandigarh Group of Colleges-Jhanjeri, Mohali, 140307, Punjab, India.
K Satyam NaiduDepartment of Chemistry, Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, 531162, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Rajesh SinghUttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, 248007, Uttarakhand, India.
Teena VishwakarmaIES Institute of Pharmacy, IES University, Bhopal, 462044, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sonam PuriNew Delhi Institute of Management, Tughlakabad Institutional Area, New Delhi, India.
Muhammed ShabilCenter for Global Health Research, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Anuradha YadavGraphic Era Institute of Medical Sciences, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University, Clement Town, Dehradun, India.
Takveer SinghCentre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140417, India.
Sahil KhuranaChitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, 174103, India.
Rachana MehtaClinical Microbiology, RDC, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad, 121004, Haryana, India.
Prakasini SatapathyUniversity Center for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Renu SahSR Sanjeevani Hospital, Kalyanpur, 56517, Siraha, Nepal. renusahdoc@gmail.com.
Abhay M GaidhaneGlobal Health Academy, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education, Wardha, India. abhay.psm@dmiher.edu.in.
Ganesh BushiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue and leptospirosis are prominent vector-borne diseases in tropical and subtropical regions, sharing overlapping geographic distribution and clinical presentations, which complicates diagnosis and management. Co-infection of these pathogens places additional strain on healthcare resources in endemic areas. This study aims to systematically estimate the prevalence and mortality rates of dengue and leptospirosis co-infections and assess their clinical implications.

methodsAdhering the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to October 2024. Nested Knowledge was used for screening and data extraction. Studies reporting quantitative data on the prevalence or mortality of dengue and leptospirosis co-infections were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical analyses, including prevalence and mortality estimation, sensitivity analysis were conducted using R, with heterogeneity evaluated by the I² statistic.

resultsOut of 3,982 records, 14 studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding a pooled prevalence of dengue and leptospirosis co-infection at 2.33% (95% CI: 1.41-3.46%) across 16,638 participants, with significant heterogeneity (I² = 90%). The prediction interval for co-infection ranged from 0.05 to 7.27%. The pooled mortality rate among co-infected patients was 9.96% (95% CI: 0-53.49%), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 71%). The prediction interval for mortality ranged from 0.00 to 100%. Publication bias was indicated by an LFK index of 2.52.

conclusionThis meta-analysis revealed a moderate prevalence and a notable mortality rate for dengue and leptospirosis co-infections, with significant variability observed across different studies. Further research into the immunopathology and the implementation of integrated surveillance systems could enhance the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment strategies in regions where these diseases are endemic.

Indexed as

CoinfectionDengueLeptospirosisHumansPrevalenceCo-infectionDengueLeptospirosisMeta-analysisPrevalenceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39856559
PMCPMC11760719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.