ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025
Participatory Action Research to Enhance Patient-Centred Goal Setting in Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Nursing Team's Quest.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to provide insights into how, through exploring goal-setting interventions, a nursing team in geriatric rehabilitation might refine their patient-centred strategies.
designThe study design was participatory action research (PAR).
methodTeam members and nursing students, under the guidance of a facilitator, performed two PAR cycles. In the first cycle, the action phase consisted of preparing a multidisciplinary team meeting (MTM) with a patient. In the second cycle, based on the evaluation of the first, the participants worked with goals on a whiteboard in the patient's room. The data were collected in The Netherlands between February 2020 and June 2022. The data collection methods included the facilitator's logbook, observations, (group) interviews, charting activities and short surveys. Data analysis was conducted in weekly team sessions. The Guidelines for Best Practices in the Reporting of Participatory Action Research were followed.
resultsIn the first PAR cycle, the team learned that preparing an MTM with a patient did not enhance the patient's engagement in achieving their rehabilitation goals, but it was beneficial for the nurses' intermediate role between the patient and the multidisciplinary team. Clarity about responsibilities in the multidisciplinary team was a prerequisite for nurses to take on this role adequately. In the second PAR cycle, it became clear that working with a whiteboard in the patient's room had a positive effect on the patient's engagement in the rehabilitation process, and the nurses gained knowledge about a broader variety of professional rehabilitation domains.
conclusionThrough PAR, the nursing team learned two lessons: cooperating with patients through MTM preparation and working with whiteboards enhanced their patient-centredness, but patients needed tangible goals to become engaged in their rehabilitation planning. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: Prepare the multidisciplinary team meeting with the patient, as discussing rehabilitation goals can indirectly boost motivation by making older patients feel seen and heard, even if they seem unable to fully participate in the conversation. Clarify responsibilities in the multidisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation team. This is a prerequisite for nurses to take on an advocacy role for patients in multidisciplinary team meetings. To enhance patient-centred care, consider working with tangible goals on a whiteboard in the patient's room. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No public and patient involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.