ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2025
Network Analysis of Psychological Empowerment, Need for Cognition, and Academic Self-Efficacy among Graduate Students.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study employed network analysis to explore the interrelationships between academic self-efficacy, psychological empowerment, and the need for knowledge at the symptom level among graduate students. Three hundred fifty-three graduate students from King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia (63.5% male, 72.2% in the 25-35 age range) completed the Psychological Empowerment Scale, Need for Cognition Scale (NCS), and Academic Self-Efficacy Scale as self-report measures. Different R-Studio programming software packages, such as "graph," "network tools," and "botnet," were used to analyze the current study's data. The most central node on the network analysis was Self.2 (history of success/failure), with the greatest betweenness (2.18), closeness (1.84), and strength (1.86). This node showed that it was essential for connecting other variables, despite having an expected negative effect (-0.37). Then there was also Psy.4 (impact), which showed a high centrality of betweenness 1.13 and closeness 1.29. Indeed, positive edges for Self.2 (previous successes/failures) and MB (Need for Cognition) (edge weight 0.37) clearly showed that good past experiences increased cognitive activity. A Bridge Betweenness of 10 was the most significant bridge node (Self.4 (university behavior) in the bridge analysis), linking network elements. Bootstrapped confidence intervals proved that these connections remained stable, ensuring the network was robust over resamples. Enhancing graduate students' self-efficacy and psychological empowerment, particularly through positive past experiences, could improve their academic performance and cognitive engagement. Future research should explore the implications of these findings for designing interventions to foster academic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39856484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.