Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856439›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2025

Amoebas: the omnipotent organism and silent assassin.

Camila Salazar-Ardiles, Kristell Paredes Valencia, David C Andrade

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camila Salazar-ArdilesLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Applied Microbiology, Biomedical Department, Research Center in High Altitude Medicine and Physiology, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Antofagasta, 1240000, Antofagasta, Chile. camila.nickol@uantof.cl.
Kristell Paredes ValenciaLaboratory of Molecular Biology and Applied Microbiology, Biomedical Department, Research Center in High Altitude Medicine and Physiology, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Antofagasta, 1240000, Antofagasta, Chile.
David C AndradeExercise Applied Physiology Laboratory, Biomedical Department, Research Center in High Altitude Medicine and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo NAM24I0095US federal funding GRANT14116787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amoebas are characterized by their unique ability to exist both as free-living organisms and, occasionally, as parasites within host tissues, earning them the designation 'amphizoic amoebae'. While amoebic infections are less prevalent, their health impact can be tremendous, leading to several diseases. In low-income countries, poor sanitation and socioeconomic conditions significantly increase the risk of amoebic infections, particularly E. histolytica, which affects up to 50 million people and causes over 100,000 deaths each year. Diagnostic methods, including microscopy, serological tests, polymerase chain reaction, and the loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay, have improved the accuracy and timeliness of amoeba diagnosis. However, these methodologies are often cost-prohibitive for developing countries. Conversely, current treatments involve aggressive protocols using antibiotics, antifungals, and anticancer agents. However, the prognosis for severe infections such as Primary Amoebic Meningoencephalitis and Granulomatous Amebic Encephalitis remains poor. Despite advancements, effective treatments, and new low-cost therapeutic options are still being researched. Thus, the current review sought to provide a description of molecular aspects such as amoeba virulence factors and invasion processes, focusing on recent advances in the detection, identification, and treatment of associated diseases.

Indexed as

AmebiasisAmoebaEntamoeba histolyticaHumansVirulence FactorsVirulence FactorsAmoebaDiagnosticInvasionMortalityPathogenic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.