ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025
The misleading terminology of minor amputation of the lower limb.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA pronounced loss of function of the lower limb of various origins, especially with an infection-related course, may require a minor (MIN) or major (MAJ) amputation of the lower limb. Our aim was to contrast the underlying etiology, including previous trauma, surgical procedure, and the subsequent function.
methodsBetween 2012 and 2022, 366 lower limb amputations were considered. After excluding isolated toe amputations and knee disarticulations, 80 amputations of 77 patients (66 male; 11 female; mean age: 57.2 years) were included in this monocentric retrospective study and their clinical outcome was evaluated. Briefly, 23 patients underwent MIN and 54 patients, including three bilateral cases, underwent MAJ. Patient demographics, etiology, level of amputation, prosthesis fitting, mobility based on the K-Level categories, SF-12 questionnaire, PLUS-M 12-item short form, and problems in coping with everyday life were recorded. The mean follow-up period was 3.9 years.
resultsThe mean SF-12 score of all patients was 36.9 (MIN: 37.24; MAJ: 36.85) for the physical summary component and 50.0 (MIN: 52.32; MAJ: 48.46) for the mental summary component; the mean Plus-M 12 score was 49.5 (MIN: 50,08; MAJ: 48,46) (p > 0.05). K-level 3 was the most common in all patients (MIN: 47.8%, MAJ: 42.6%), defined as an unrestricted outdoor walker.
conclusionWith MIN and MAJ results comparable in all scores and queries, it emphasizes the fact that even supposedly lower-limb MIN represents a considerable impairment of coping with daily life. If there is no prospect of preserving the limb, early transtibial amputation should be considered. However, our results support the good outcome despite lower-limb MAJ through modern prosthetic fitting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39856407What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.