ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of microvascular obstruction from angio-based microvascular resistance and available clinical data in percutaneous coronary intervention: an explainable machine learning model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable machine learning prediction of tracheostomy after craniotomy for supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Elevated angiography-derived microvascular resistance and HbA1c levels jointly predict adverse outcomes in patients with diabetic STEMI: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Persistent Impairment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in an Ice Swimming Champion.Journal of medical cases · 2025Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Radiological Cardiovascular Imaging-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Angio-based microvascular resistance (AMR) as a potential alternative to the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and its relationship with microvascular obstruction (MVO) and other cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters still lacks comprehensive validation. This study aimed to validate the correlation between AMR and CMR-derived parameters and to construct an interpretable machine learning (ML) model, incorporating AMR and clinical data, to forecast MVO in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We enrolled 452 STEMI patients from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between 2018 and 2022, who received both PPCI and CMR. After PPCI, AMR measurements and CMR-derived parameters were recorded, and clinical data were gathered. The ML workflow comprised feature selection using the Boruta algorithm, model construction with seven classifiers, hyperparameter optimization via ten-fold cross-validation, model comparison based on the area under the curve (AUC), and a Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis to analyze the significance of different features. 32.29% of patients showed inconsistency between AMR and MVO, but we successfully constructed a predictive model for MVO. Among the classifiers, Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) post hyperparameter optimization displayed superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.911 and 0.846 in the training and validation sets, respectively. SHAP analysis identified AMR as a pivotal predictor of MVO. Although we observed the inconsistency between AMR and MVO but the ML-based construction of MVO prediction model is feasible, which brings the possibility of timely prediction of patients with MVO and timely imposition of interventions during PPCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.