Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856367›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025

Alterations in Muscle Coordination to Reduce Knee Joint Loading for People with Limb Loss.

Jiayu Hu, Ziyun Ding, Anthony M J Bull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiayu HuSchool of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Ziyun DingSchool of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. z.ding@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-792X
Anthony M J BullDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/V057138/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople with unilateral transtibial amputation experienced a higher incidence of knee osteoarthritis due to abnormal movement patterns. This study aimed to explore alternations in muscle coordination to reduce mechanical burdens in their daily activities.

methodsFive males with unilateral transtibial amputation were recruited. Two daily activities (level walking and standing up from a chair) were simulated using muscle-driven simulation. Two cost functions were applied: minimising the knee adduction moment and minimising both the knee adduction moment and knee flexion moment. This enabled the identification of altered muscle coordination and any possible changes in kinematic patterns.

resultsFor people with unilateral transtibial amputation, reducing knee adduction angles during stance was found effective in reducing knee adduction moments. To mitigate peak contact forces at the intact knee, muscle activations of vasti and gastrocnemius should be decreased, while muscle activations of soleus should be increased during activities of level walking and standing up from a chair.

conclusionOur study suggested that minimising knee adduction moments was effective in reducing joint loading during level walking while minimising both knee adduction moments and knee flexion moments was effective during standing up from a chair. Therefore, the alteration of muscle coordination should be carefully designed for different daily activities.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalKnee JointModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleMiddle AgedWalkingWeight-BearingAmputeeKinematicsKnee contact forceKnee joint momentMuscle coordinationMusculoskeletal modelling

Identifiers

PMID39856367
PMCPMC11929717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.