ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Access to child-appropriate medicines: an exploratory survey of the use of paediatric use marketing authorisation products in the UK.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "We've managed to find our own path of how we do it": exploring parental perceptions of using age-inappropriate formulations at home-a qualitative study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Children's drug research and development incentives and market pricing optimization based on medical imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Utilization of Child-Appropriate Medicines: Use of Pediatric Use Marketing Authorisation (PUMA) Products in Croatia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisation (PUMA) was introduced in the European Union to incentivise the development of off-patent medicines in children. However, there is limited data on the accessibility of PUMA products at the healthcare provider level. This study aimed to identify factors affecting real-world accessibility to PUMA products in the United Kingdom (UK). Inductive thematic analyses of the archives of the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacy Group (NPPG) online forum were conducted. A web-based survey was also distributed to NPPG members in September 2022 regarding the availability of PUMA products in their organisations. Thematic analysis generated five themes: authorisation, availability, affordability, appropriateness and acceptability. Restricted scope of the product's marketing authorisation, market access variation, higher cost of PUMA products, product appropriateness and patient acceptability were reasons for continued off-label use and use of unlicensed products in clinical practice. Conclusion: Despite targeted legislative efforts to bring off-label uses in children into authorised use, this study provides evidence that authorisation alone does not equate to market availability, which in turn does not guarantee patient access. The study findings also suggest that cost pressure drives local procurement decisions and overshadows the long-standing problems associated with off-label use and manipulation of medicines in children. What is already known about this subject • The Paediatric Use Marketing Authorisation (PUMA) was introduced in the European Union (applied to the UK at the time) to incentivise the development of off-patient medicines exclusively for use in the paediatric population. • It is widely acknowledged that the PUMA concept has not achieved its intended goal, as evidenced by the few products authorised through this route. What this study adds • This study shows inequalities in children's access to PUMA products in the UK. • Determinants impeding patient access to child-appropriate paediatric medicines can be categorised into five dimensions: authorisation, availability, affordability, appropriateness, and acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.