Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856352›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Patient-specific implants combined with 3D-printed drilling guides for corrective osteotomies of multiplanar tibial and femoral shaft malunions leads to more accurate corrections.

M G E Oldhoff, C Posada Alvarez, K Ten Duis, J N Doornberg, N Assink, F F A IJpma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Femoral diaphysis malunion: An overview.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2026
    Review
  3. Experience with patient-specific guides, insteatientad of general surgical experience, improves the accuracy of 3D-guided corrective osteotomies.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M G E OldhoffDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.g.e.oldhoff@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4161-3634
C Posada AlvarezDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0957-648X
K Ten DuisDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8920-8796
J N DoornbergDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-2742
N AssinkDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-6816
F F A IJpmaDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9420-2732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using patient-specific implants (PSI) for complex shaft corrective osteotomies in multiplanar deformities of long bones in the lower extremities. Additionally, it aimed to investigate the added value of these implants by quantifying surgical accuracy on postoperative CT, comparing their outcomes to two commonly used techniques: 3D virtual visualizations and 3D-printed surgical guides.

methodsSix tibial and femoral shaft corrective osteotomies were planned and performed on three Thiel embalmed human specimen. Depending on the specimen a different respective technique was used; 1) '3D Visualization' using 3D virtual plan preoperatively and free-hand corrective osteotomy techniques with standard manually contoured plates; 2) '3D guided' utilizing 3D surgical guides and manually contouring of conventional implant; and 3)'3D PSI' utilizing a 3D surgical guide with a patient-specific implant. Accuracy of the corrections was assessed through measurements for varus/valgus angulation, ante/recurvation, rotation and osteotomy plane error as quantified on postoperative CT-scans.

resultsTwelve corrective osteotomies were performed. For, the median difference between the surgical plan and postoperative CT assessment was 3.4°, 4.6°, and 2.2° for the '3D visualization', '3D guided', and '3D PSI' methods respectively. Regarding ante/recurvation, the differences were 3.8°, 43.8°, and 1.2°, respectively. For rotation, the differences were 11.9°, 18.7°, and 3.5°, respectively. Discrepancies between planned and executed levels of osteotomy plane were 6.2 mm, 3.2 mm, and 1.4 mm, respectively.

conclusionPSIs with 3D-printed drilling guides for complex multiplanar corrective osteotomies of femoral and tibial shaft malunions is feasible and achieves accurate corrections. This technique enables precise determination of the osteotomy plane, guides correction in all three planes, and ensures satisfactory implant fitting; thus accurately translating the virtual surgical plan into clinical practice. The 3D PSI method is beneficial for complex cases with significant multiplanar deformities in bone anatomy, particularly with rotational malalignment.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesFractures, MalunitedOsteotomyPrinting, Three-DimensionalSurgery, Computer-AssistedTibial FracturesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedTibiaTomography, X-Ray Computed3D technologyCorrective osteotomyFemoral shaftPatient-specific instrumentationTibial shaftVirtual surgical planning

Identifiers

PMID39856352
PMCPMC11761992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.