Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856332›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Sexual dimorphism of the humerus bones in a French sample: comparison of several statistical models including machine learning models.

Manon Blanc, Siam Knecht, Kathy Nguyen, Clément Poulain, Gérald Quatrehomme, Véronique Alunni, Luísa Nogueira

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manon BlancBoulevard Tanguy Prigent, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, 29200, France. manon1.blanc@chu-brest.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8899-4895
Siam KnechtAix Marseille Université, CNRS, EFS, ADES, Marseille, 13007, France.
Kathy NguyenFaculté de Médecine, Institut Universitaire d'Anthropologie Médico-Légale, Université Côte d'Azur, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, Nice Cedex 2, 06107, France.
Clément PoulainBoulevard Tanguy Prigent, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, 29200, France.
Gérald QuatrehommeFaculté de Médecine, Institut Universitaire d'Anthropologie Médico-Légale, Université Côte d'Azur, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, Nice Cedex 2, 06107, France.
Véronique AlunniFaculté de Médecine, Institut Universitaire d'Anthropologie Médico-Légale, Université Côte d'Azur, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, Nice Cedex 2, 06107, France.
Luísa NogueiraFaculté de Médecine, Institut Universitaire d'Anthropologie Médico-Légale, Université Côte d'Azur, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, Nice Cedex 2, 06107, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex estimation is an important part of skeletal analysis and forensic identification. Traditionally pelvic traits are utilized for accurate sex estimation. However, the long bones, especially humerus, have been proved to be as effective for determine the sex of the individual.The aim of this study was to compare the predictive accuracy of seven statistical modelling techniques including classical statistical methods and machine learning algorithms, to assess the sexual dimorphism of humerus on a French sample based on a metric analysis of 26 measurements. A total of 98 humeral bones (divided in two samples) were measured. Seven statistical models were compared: Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Regularized Discriminant Analysis (RDA), Penalized Logistic Regression (PLR), Flexible Discriminant Analysis (FDA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF).With cross validation, classification accuracy was greater than 90% (ranges between 92% and 98%) for all models without variable selection methods. The simplification of the models has improved the accuracy between 98% and 100% and also a reduction of the number of variables to 6 or less. Penalized logistic regression (PLR), Random Forest (RF) and Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were the best accuracy models.The measurements made at the proximal part of the humerus (WTT, CSD), at distal part (BEW, WT, MAW, THT) and of the entire bone (PLCT) stand out among the various models.The present study suggests that the humerus is an interesting alternative for sex estimation and that non-classical statistical models can provide a new approach.

Indexed as

HumerusMachine LearningModels, StatisticalSex Determination by SkeletonAdultDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleForensic AnthropologyFranceHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineYoung AdultForensic anthropologyHumerus boneMachine learningSex estimationSexual dimorphismStatistical models

Identifiers

PMID39856332
PMCPMC12003549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.