Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856322›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Type B ankle fractures with additional medium-sized posterior fragment: mid-term functional and radiological outcome after fixation versus no fixation of the posterior fragment.

A L Franx, J M Hoogendoorn, E L L Twiss, P Krijnen, S M Verhage

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Mid-term outcomes of posterior malleolar fracture plating: identifying predictors of adverse outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A L FranxDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. adriaanfranx@hotmail.com.
J M HoogendoornDepartment of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
E L L TwissDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
P KrijnenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
S M VerhageDepartment of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGuidelines for treatment of medium-sized posterior fragments in trimalleolar fractures are scarce and show varying advice. Recent trials comparing fixation and no fixation of posterior fragments, show no difference in outcomes one year postoperatively. This study compares functional outcome and development of osteoarthritis in patients with fixation of a posterior malleolar fracture to patients without fixation of the posterior malleolus fracture.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients operated for type B ankle fractures with medium-sized (5-25% of joint surface) posterior malleolar fragments in a Dutch level-1 trauma center between 2014 and 2018. ORIF of posterior fragments (FIX) was compared to no fixation (NO-FIX). Choice of treatment was based on the surgeon's preference. Functional outcome was assessed using the AOFAS-score, OMAS-score and VAS-pain. Development of osteoarthritis was assessed on radiographs. A linear regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for worse functional outcome and osteoarthritis.

results27 patients were included in the FIX group and 58 patients in the NO-FIX group. After a median follow-up of 74 months (range 50-108), no difference was observed for functional outcome and pain (median AOFAS 90 vs. 95, OMAS 85 vs. 88, VAS-pain 1 vs. 1; all p > 0.05). Osteoarthritis rates were comparable (grade ≥ 2: 22% in FIX vs. 21% in NO-FIX, p = 0.87). Median fragment size was 15.7% versus 13.6% of the tibial articular surface after FIX and NO-FIX respectively. Median postoperative step-off on radiograph was 0.0 mm after FIX and 0.8 mm after NO-FIX (p = 0.20). Complication rates, including infection, secondary operation and hardware removal, were comparable. Postoperative step-off > 1 mm increased the risk of osteoarthritis (odds ratio 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-12.7).

conclusionThe value of fixation of medium-sized posterior fragments in type B ankle fractures seems limited after mid-term follow-up, although functional impairment caused by osteoarthritis might develop in the long-term. Because postoperative step-off > 1 mm increases the risk of osteoarthritis, restoration of the tibial plafond seems essential.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOsteoarthritisRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnkle fracturePosterior fragment fixationPosterior malleolar fracturePosterolateral approachTrimalleolar fracture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.