Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856289›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2025

Advances in knowledge and practice benefiting the health and management of first permanent molars in children.

Greig D Taylor, Victoria Bulmer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Greig D TaylorSchool of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK. Greig.taylor@newcastle.ac.uk.
Victoria BulmerSchool of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First permanent molars (FPMs) remain the most affected teeth by dental conditions in childhood. Maintaining the health of FPMs should be prioritised by dental professionals. However, if subjected to unfavourable circumstances, FPMs can become compromised and impact the child negatively. In this article, we highlight current thinking and provide practical tips to prevent FPMs from becoming compromised. The importance of including the young person in decision-making and the influence different dental conditions might have on management of FPMs are discussed. Finally, the impact and treatment options available for FPMs should they become compromised are explored, focusing on the main question of whether to restore or extract these teeth.

Indexed as

Dental Care for ChildrenMolarChildDental CariesDentition, PermanentHumansTooth Extraction

Identifiers

PMID39856289
PMCPMC11761069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.