ArticleScientific reports2025
A data driven machine learning approach for predicting and optimizing sulfur compound adsorption on metal organic frameworks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carboxylate-Ligand-Based Coordination Polymers and Metal Complexes: From Structural Diversity and Supramolecular Descriptors to Function-Oriented Design.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring the adsorption desulfurization efficiency using RSM and ANN methodologies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study employed some machine learning (ML) techniques with Python programming to forecast the adsorption capacity of MOF adsorbents for thiophenic compounds namely benzothiophene (BT), dibenzothiophene (DBT), and 4,6-dimethyl dibenzothiophene (4,6-DMDBT). Five ML models were developed with the help of a dataset containing 676 rows to correlate the adsorbent features, adsorption conditions, and adsorbate characteristics to the MOF sample's sulfur adsorption capability. Among the ML approaches, MLP model achieved the best performance with a low mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0032 on the test set and 0.0021 on the training set and mean relative error (MRE) of 15.26% on the test set. Also, Random Forest model yielded a higher test MSE of 0.0045 and MRE of 17.83%. Feature importance analysis was performed by utilizing MLP model and shapely additive plan (SHAP) method, and the findings revealed that "initial concentration of sulfur" (SHAP value 0.51) and "contact time" (SHAP value 0.37) were the crucial factors influenced desulfurization process efficiency. Additionally, a comparative analysis of the features utilizing the MLP network classified the factors into three primary categories: process conditions, adsorbent characteristics, and adsorbate characteristics. Consequently, the process condition was identified as the most significant group compared to others. Finally, the desulfurization process optimization indicated the maximum DBT adsorption of 161.6 mg/g for Zr-based MOF could be achieved when the features including BET, TPV, pore size, oil/adsorbent ration, and temperature were tuned around 756 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.