Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39856195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A data driven machine learning approach for predicting and optimizing sulfur compound adsorption on metal organic frameworks.

Mohsen Shayanmehr, Sepehr Aarabi, Ahad Ghaemi, Alireza Hemmati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohsen ShayanmehrSchool of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Sepehr AarabiSchool of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Ahad GhaemiSchool of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran. aghaemi@iust.ac.ir.
Alireza HemmatiSchool of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study employed some machine learning (ML) techniques with Python programming to forecast the adsorption capacity of MOF adsorbents for thiophenic compounds namely benzothiophene (BT), dibenzothiophene (DBT), and 4,6-dimethyl dibenzothiophene (4,6-DMDBT). Five ML models were developed with the help of a dataset containing 676 rows to correlate the adsorbent features, adsorption conditions, and adsorbate characteristics to the MOF sample's sulfur adsorption capability. Among the ML approaches, MLP model achieved the best performance with a low mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0032 on the test set and 0.0021 on the training set and mean relative error (MRE) of 15.26% on the test set. Also, Random Forest model yielded a higher test MSE of 0.0045 and MRE of 17.83%. Feature importance analysis was performed by utilizing MLP model and shapely additive plan (SHAP) method, and the findings revealed that "initial concentration of sulfur" (SHAP value 0.51) and "contact time" (SHAP value 0.37) were the crucial factors influenced desulfurization process efficiency. Additionally, a comparative analysis of the features utilizing the MLP network classified the factors into three primary categories: process conditions, adsorbent characteristics, and adsorbate characteristics. Consequently, the process condition was identified as the most significant group compared to others. Finally, the desulfurization process optimization indicated the maximum DBT adsorption of 161.6 mg/g for Zr-based MOF could be achieved when the features including BET, TPV, pore size, oil/adsorbent ration, and temperature were tuned around 756 m

Indexed as

Adsorptive desulfurizationMachine learningMOFs adsorbentsThiophenic compounds removal

Identifiers

PMID39856195
PMCPMC11761476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.