ArticleScientific reports2025
Tool wear prediction based on XGBoost feature selection combined with PSO-BP network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenge of accurately capturing tool wear states in small sample scenarios, this paper proposes a tool wear prediction method that combines XGBoost feature selection with a PSO-BP network. In order to solve the problem of input feature selection and parameter selection in BP neural network, a double-layer programming model of input feature and parameter selection is established, which is solved by XGBoost and PSO. Initially, vibration and cutting force signals from CNC machining are preprocessed using time-domain segmentation, Hampel filtering, and wavelet denoising. Subsequently, time-domain, frequency-domain, and time-frequency domain features are extracted from the preprocessed data using FFT and wavelet packet decomposition, followed by feature screening for tool wear mapping via Pearson correlation and XGBoost feature importance analysis as model input. Finally, PSO is employed to optimize BPNN parameters. Experimental results show that PSO outperforms other algorithms in training the tool wear prediction model, with XGBoost feature selection reducing model construction time by 57.4% and increasing accuracy by 63.57%, demonstrating superior feature selection capabilities over Decision Tree, Random Fores, Adaboost and Extra Trees. These findings suggest that the proposed method can effectively predict tool wear in real-world CNC machining, contributing to improved production efficiency, reduced tool replacement frequency, and lower maintenance costs, thereby providing valuable insights for industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.