ReviewNPJ digital medicine2025
V3+ extends the V3 framework to ensure user-centricity and scalability of sensor-based digital health technologies.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Tier Validation of a Single-Lead Wearable ECG Signal-Processing Pipeline: Clinical Comparison and Algorithmic Benchmarking on Public Expert-Annotated Databases.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing Neurorehabilitation and Recovery Through Human Movement Quantification via Wearable Sensing.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Article
- Operationalizing AI-Enabled Cardiovascular Biomarkers: A Clinician-Centered Framework for Validation, Governance, and Workflow Integration.JMIR cardio · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction: Scoping Review of Bias and Clinical Utility Documentation in 2019-2024.JMIR AI · 2026Review
- Validation of an Algorithmic Pipeline for Wrist-Worn Devices to Estimate Walking Speed in People with Multiple Long-Term Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating digital cognitive tests for clinical use in Alzheimer's disease: A novel framework and scoping review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- A Digital Cueing Intervention for Parkinsonian Gait: Laboratory-Based Clinical Validation and Acute Gait Responses.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Mobgap: A State-of-the-Art Python Framework for Reproducible Estimation and Algorithm Validation of Digital Mobility Outcomes from a Single Wearable Device.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical telemonitoring and telerehabilitation of cognition in rare neurological diseases: a scoping review.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Continuous Non-Invasive Assessment of Segmental Cervical Motion: A Narrative Review and Validation Framework.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- MS360°: a conceptual digital-first, data-driven hybrid care framework for personalised multiple sclerosis management.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on digital biomarkers for monitoring inflammatory arthritis: insights from a qualitative study rooted in design thinking.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis: a narrative review.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Co-designing the future: End-user involvement in digital interventions.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The future of clinical trials? Monitoring mobility as an outcome measure in Parkinson's disease: The mobilise-D study.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Toward Patient-Centric Digital Monitoring of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Quality of Evidence in Remote Monitoring of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Older adults' views of passive smartphone monitoring for dementia risk: a multi-method analysis.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
- Digital assessment in myasthenia gravis: evidence, validation, and a proposed framework for autoimmune heterogeneity, remote monitoring, and clinical endpoints.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Methods for analytical validation of novel digital clinical measures: A simulation study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose the addition of usability validation to the extended V3 framework, now "V3+", and describe a pragmatic approach to ensuring that sensor-based digital health technologies can be used optimally at scale by diverse users. Alongside the original V3 components (verification; analytical validation; clinical validation), usability validation will ensure user-centricity of digital measurement tools, paving the way for more inclusive, reliable, and trustworthy digital measures within clinical research and clinical care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.