ArticleScientific reports2025
Symbolic regression for strength prediction of eccentrically loaded concrete-filled steel tubular columns.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of ultimate strength and strain in FRP wrapped oval shaped concrete columns using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns are widely employed in high-rise buildings, long-span bridges, and seismic-resistant structures due to their superior load-bearing capacity, structural efficiency, and resilience under extreme loading conditions. This study uses symbolic regression with structural design code provisions to predict the eccentric strength of concrete filled-steel tubular columns with circular shape (CCFST) and rectangular shape (RCFST). Previous studies have used two distinct approaches for estimating eccentric strength: explainable models based on theoretical derivations and black-box models derived from machine learning (ML) methods. This study proposes a hybrid model derived from the design code standards, with performance enhanced by the symbolic regression technique. This model is based on a comprehensive experimental database of 464 tests for CCFST columns and 313 tests for RCFST columns under eccentric loading from various research papers. The developed code-based symbolic regression (C-SR) displays both robust and interpretable, demonstrating high prediction accuracy with mean values of the prediction-to-actual ratios of 1.006 and 0.997 and coefficient of variation (CoV) values of 0.117 and 0.098 for CCFSTs and RCFSTs, respectively, while providing explainable mathematical expressions that align with the mechanical principles of code provisions. The developed C-SR model is benchmarked against EC4 and AISC360 standards and evaluated against the various ML techniques, demonstrating acceptable performance. The results highlight the C-SR model's effectiveness in providing reliable predictions and valuable insights for practical engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.