ArticleScientific reports2025
Utility of complexity analysis in electroencephalography and electromyography for automated classification of sleep-wake states in mice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oligodendrocyte prosaposin restores subarachnoid haemorrhage-induced consciousness impairment.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Article
- An explainable EEG epilepsy detection model using friend pattern.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Circadian activity and sleep architecture in autism spectrum disorder mouse model withFrontiers in sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We explore an innovative approach to sleep stage analysis by incorporating complexity features into sleep scoring methods for mice. Traditional sleep scoring relies on the power spectral features of electroencephalogram (EEG) and the electromyogram (EMG) amplitude. We introduced a novel methodology for sleep stage classification based on two types of complexity analysis, namely multiscale entropy and detrended fluctuation analysis. Our analysis revealed significant variances in these complexities, not only within the specific theta and delta bands but across a wide frequency spectrum. Based on these findings, we developed a sleep stage scoring model, termed Sleep Analyzer Complex (SAC), a convolutional neural network model that integrates these complexity features with conventional EEG spectrum and EMG amplitude analysis. This integrated model significantly enhances the accuracy of sleep stage identification, achieving an accuracy of 97.4-98.1% for novel wild-type mice, on par with the agreement level among human scorers (97.3-97.8%). The efficacy of SAC was validated through tests conducted on wild-type mice, and it demonstrated remarkable success in identifying sleep architecture abnormalities in narcoleptic mice as well. This approach not only facilitates automated scoring of sleep/wakefulness states but also holds the potential to uncover detailed physiological insights, thereby advancing EEG-based sleep research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.