Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39855659›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Virtual consultation in kidney care: a mixed-methods study on a model for safe and effective integration into routine clinical care.

Mark Courtney, Stephanie Thompson, Scott Klarenbach, Feng Ye, Deenaz Zaidi, Terry J Smith, Aminu K Bello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark CourtneyNephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada mc@ualberta.ca.
Stephanie ThompsonNephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3109-6837
Scott KlarenbachUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8611-1056
Feng YeUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Deenaz ZaidiMedicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5546-684X
Terry J SmithAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Aminu K BelloMedicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectiveGlobally, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid introduction of virtual care delivery via telephone or videoconference. The rapid advancements in e-health technology facilitated options for virtual care, including asynchronous data transfer in virtual clinic models and patient-facing smartphone applications for communications and self-care. However, the clinical benefits of virtual consultation have not been consistently demonstrated in all facets of kidney care, and the adoption of this innovation alters workflows and health professionals' perceptions of care delivery. This study evaluated the integration of virtual outpatient consultation safely and effectively into the kidney care programme in Alberta. STUDY

designWe leveraged a mixed-methods approach to collate data about clinicians' experiences and opinions, forming the basis for the qualitative part of the study. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were collected through surveys, interviews and focus groups of nephrologists and home dialysis nurses. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Focus group/interview transcripts for nephrologists and nurses were used to generate initial codebooks, which were iteratively refined throughout the analysis. Codes were categorised and analysed thematically, and data collected from nephrologists and nurses were analysed separately.

resultsThe findings demonstrated that clinicians support the use of routine virtual care. Clinicians' opinions on implementation requirements emphasised logistics for routine virtual care integration, quality of care delivered, impacts on the therapeutic relationship and regulatory policy clarification. LIMITATION: The generalisability of the findings is limited in scope, as the study was conducted in a single nephrology programme in Canada, and may not apply to other provinces or settings.

conclusionsThese findings inform recommendations for safe and effective virtual care delivery and can be leveraged to inform virtual care designs in kidney care programmes. Further study is required to clarify the impacts of virtual care on specific population demographics based on geography (rural vs urban) and age (elderly population) in the post-COVID-19 era, and determine how to effectively integrate patient perspectives into this model of care.

Indexed as

COVID-19NephrologyRemote ConsultationTelemedicineAlbertaAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Chronic DiseaseDialysisNurses

Identifiers

PMID39855659
PMCPMC11758694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.