ArticleBMJ open2025
Virtual consultation in kidney care: a mixed-methods study on a model for safe and effective integration into routine clinical care.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing the How of Implementation: A Hermeneutic Exploration of Implementing Virtual Kidney Care in a Remote, Rural Health Region.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Reducing Polypharmacy-Related Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study of a Digitally Mediated Pharmacist Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing Patient-Centered Communication in Hemodialysis Symptom Management Care-Development and Validation of the HSB-HD Scale for Assessing Help-Seeking Behavior in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multiphase Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectiveGlobally, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid introduction of virtual care delivery via telephone or videoconference. The rapid advancements in e-health technology facilitated options for virtual care, including asynchronous data transfer in virtual clinic models and patient-facing smartphone applications for communications and self-care. However, the clinical benefits of virtual consultation have not been consistently demonstrated in all facets of kidney care, and the adoption of this innovation alters workflows and health professionals' perceptions of care delivery. This study evaluated the integration of virtual outpatient consultation safely and effectively into the kidney care programme in Alberta. STUDY
designWe leveraged a mixed-methods approach to collate data about clinicians' experiences and opinions, forming the basis for the qualitative part of the study. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were collected through surveys, interviews and focus groups of nephrologists and home dialysis nurses. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Focus group/interview transcripts for nephrologists and nurses were used to generate initial codebooks, which were iteratively refined throughout the analysis. Codes were categorised and analysed thematically, and data collected from nephrologists and nurses were analysed separately.
resultsThe findings demonstrated that clinicians support the use of routine virtual care. Clinicians' opinions on implementation requirements emphasised logistics for routine virtual care integration, quality of care delivered, impacts on the therapeutic relationship and regulatory policy clarification. LIMITATION: The generalisability of the findings is limited in scope, as the study was conducted in a single nephrology programme in Canada, and may not apply to other provinces or settings.
conclusionsThese findings inform recommendations for safe and effective virtual care delivery and can be leveraged to inform virtual care designs in kidney care programmes. Further study is required to clarify the impacts of virtual care on specific population demographics based on geography (rural vs urban) and age (elderly population) in the post-COVID-19 era, and determine how to effectively integrate patient perspectives into this model of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.