ArticlePsychiatry research2025
Epigenetic age across development in children and adolescents with ADHD.
Article in Psychiatry research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Child and adolescent internalizing and externalizing traits, and epigenetic summary scores: A scoping review.Biological psychology · 2025Article
- Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: insights, advances and challenges in research and practice.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental condition, though symptoms vary both within and between people in the population. We aimed to investigate trajectories of individual biological aging through the change in residuals of DNA methylation age estimates (EpiAge) regressed on chronological age (EpiAge Gap) in children and adolescents with and without ADHD.
methodsThree well-established epigenetic clocks (PedBE, Horvath, and Skin & blood) were used to estimate EpiAge in 293 saliva samples from 169 participants (91 with ADHD symptoms) from the Neuroimaging of the Children's Attention Project (NICAP). Participants attended single (cross-sectional sample, n = 75) or multiple (2-3) waves of assessment (longitudinal sample, n = 94). We compared EpiAge Gap between ADHD and control groups cross-sectionally and longitudinally, and replicated these findings in a second pediatric cohort from the Oregon ADHD-1000 cohort.
resultsAcross all three clocks, EpiAge Gap was comparable between ADHD and controls from the cross-sectional sample, and was a null finding for our longitudinal analysis of change in EpiAge Gap, after FDR correction (pFDR=0.24). Both cross-sectional and longitudinal findings were consistent in the replication cohort.
conclusionThis study found no strong evidence of differential epigenetic aging in developing children and adolescents with or without ADHD. Larger cohort studies, which utilize estimates over a prolonged duration, crossing both early and later developmental periods, would further our understanding of biological age in ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.