ArticleJournal of the neurological sciences2025
Awareness and care practices for rare neurologic diseases among senior neurologists: A global survey.
Article in Journal of the neurological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-attention guided explainable deep transformer model for multi-level classification of rare neurological disorders using MRI images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Awareness and care practices for rare neurologic diseases among senior neurologists: A global survey.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRare neurologic diseases (RNDs) are difficult to diagnose and treat due to their low prevalence and complex nature. This survey evaluated awareness and current care status of RNDs among esteemed neurologists affiliated with the World Federation of Neurology (WFN).
methodsA 34-question survey was distributed to renowned neurologists, including delegates from national neurology societies in the WFN Assembly, various WFN committees, and members of the Rare Neurologic Diseases Specialist group. Responses were stratified by geographical regions, including Africa, the Americas, Asia/Oceania, and Europe, and into four income groups based on the World Bank Indicator. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, stratified by geographical regions or income groups, and significant differences were assessed by Fisher's exact test.
resultsOf 190 invited neurologists, 64 responded (34 % response rate). Among respondents, 89 % agreed that RND patients should receive timely and effective care on par with more common neurological conditions. Additionally, 77 % of respondents overall thought most RNDs could be accurately diagnosed in their country. However, there were significant differences in the perceived ability of respondents' country of practice to diagnose RNDs by region, specifically in Africa (25 %), and by income of country of practice, specifically in the lower-income group (17 %).
conclusionsThis global survey highlights varying RND diagnosis and care by country socioeconomic status, suggesting potential disparities in resources and preparedness. To improve outcomes and quality-of-life for RND patients, efforts should focus on improving diagnostic capabilities, fostering collaboration among neurology centers, and promoting education on the unique challenges and treatment options of RNDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.