SynthesisBrazilian journal of physical therapy
Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical therapy assistance during labor may provide physical and emotional support to the expectant mother. Through specific techniques, physical therapists may help alleviate pain, improve mobility, and facilitate a safer and more comfortable delivery.
objectiveTo perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the potential benefits and risks of physical therapy assistance during labor.
methodsA search was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases, with no restrictions on dates or language. The terms "Physical therapy assistance" and "Labor" were used. Randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials comparing a group receiving physical therapy assistance during labor with a control group receiving standard care were included. The Cochrane tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the Risk of Bias, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Quantitative analysis was performed through meta-analyses.
resultsTwelve studies involving 984 pregnant women were included. There was an increase frequency of vaginal deliveries (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17; 9 studies; I
conclusionPhysical therapy assistance during labor provides a number of benefits to the mother.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.