ArticleMedicine2025
A case report of anaphylactic shock caused by lidocaine.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Respiratory and Pulmonary Allergic Emergencies in Dental and Periodontal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Identification, Management, and Prevention Strategies.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleLocal anesthesia is a widely used technique for emergency wound closure, with lidocaine among the most commonly employed local anesthetics. Allergic reactions to lidocaine are rare, with anaphylaxis being even more uncommon. PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS: This report describes a 72-year-old male patient who presented with a right foot injury and underwent wound suturing under lidocaine local anesthesia. Although the procedure went smoothly, the patient developed dizziness, cold sweats, hypotension, and bradycardia 30 minutes later, leading to a diagnosis of anaphylaxis due to lidocaine allergy. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: Immediate treatment for anaphylactic shock was initiated, including intramuscular administration of adrenaline, fluid resuscitation, anti-inflammatory agents, antihistamines, oxygen therapy, and symptomatic supportive care. Within 20 minutes of active treatment, the patient's symptoms were effectively controlled. The patient was safely discharged after 24 hours of observation. Health education was provided to enhance self-management skills. LESSONS: Although rare, anaphylaxis induced by lidocaine can be fatal. Early recognition, prompt intervention, thorough preoperative assessment, and careful postoperative monitoring are critical to improving survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.