Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854736›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

A case report of anaphylactic shock caused by lidocaine.

Jiang-Hui Mi, Ting-Ting Shen, Hong-Wei Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiang-Hui MiShanxi Provincial Integrated TCM and WM Hospital, Taiyuan, China.ORCID 0009-0008-5365-2228
Ting-Ting ShenShanxi Provincial Integrated TCM and WM Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Hong-Wei WangShanxi Provincial Integrated TCM and WM Hospital, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

Shanxi Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2024ZYYB023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleLocal anesthesia is a widely used technique for emergency wound closure, with lidocaine among the most commonly employed local anesthetics. Allergic reactions to lidocaine are rare, with anaphylaxis being even more uncommon. PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS: This report describes a 72-year-old male patient who presented with a right foot injury and underwent wound suturing under lidocaine local anesthesia. Although the procedure went smoothly, the patient developed dizziness, cold sweats, hypotension, and bradycardia 30 minutes later, leading to a diagnosis of anaphylaxis due to lidocaine allergy. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: Immediate treatment for anaphylactic shock was initiated, including intramuscular administration of adrenaline, fluid resuscitation, anti-inflammatory agents, antihistamines, oxygen therapy, and symptomatic supportive care. Within 20 minutes of active treatment, the patient's symptoms were effectively controlled. The patient was safely discharged after 24 hours of observation. Health education was provided to enhance self-management skills. LESSONS: Although rare, anaphylaxis induced by lidocaine can be fatal. Early recognition, prompt intervention, thorough preoperative assessment, and careful postoperative monitoring are critical to improving survival rates.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineAgedEpinephrineHumansMaleAnesthetics, LocalEpinephrineLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID39854736
PMCPMC11771588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.