Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854716›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025

A 4-Week Mobile App-Based Telerehabilitation Program vs Conventional In-Person Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Sarcopenia: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lu Zhang, Ying Ge, Wowa Zhao, Xuan Shu, Lin Kang, Qiumei Wang, Ying Liu

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effectiveness of digital health exercise interventions on muscle function and physical performance in older adults with possible, confirmed, or severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lu ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0968-2822
Ying GeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9465-5207
Wowa ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4829-0307
Xuan ShuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2898-6397
Lin KangDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5034-5483
Qiumei WangDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8226-1639
Ying LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8728-549X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia is closely associated with a poor quality of life and mortality, and its prevention and treatment represent a critical area of research. Resistance training is an effective treatment for older adults with sarcopenia. However, they often face challenges when receiving traditional rehabilitation treatments at hospitals.

objectiveWe aimed to compare the effects of a digital rehabilitation program with those of traditional therapist-supervised rehabilitation training on older adults with sarcopenia.

methodsIn total, 58 older adults with sarcopenia were recruited offline and randomized (1:1) into 2 groups: the telerehabilitation group (TRG, n=29, 50%) and the in-person rehabilitation group (IRG, n=29, 50%). Both groups underwent 4-week resistance training targeting 6 major muscle groups. The TRG received exercise guidance via a mobile app, while the IRG received in-person training from a therapist. Offline assessments of body composition, grip strength, and balance using the 30-Second Arm Curl Test (30SACT), 30-Second Sitting-to-Rising Test (30SSRT), quadriceps femoris extension peak torque (EPT) and extension total power (ETP), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up-and-Go Test (TUGT), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale, were conducted before and after the intervention.

resultsOf the 58 patients, 51 (88%; TRG: n=24, 47%; IRG: n=27, 53%) completed the trial. After 4 weeks of intervention, the mean grip strength increased from 18.10 (SD 5.56) to 19.92 (SD 5.90) kg in the TRG (P=.02) and from 18.59 (SD 5.95) to 19.59 (SD 6.11) kg in the IRG (P=.01). The 30SACT and 30SSRT scores increased from 12.48 (SD 2.68) to 14.94 (SD 3.68) times (P=.01) and from 15.16 (SD 7.23) to 16.58 (SD 8.42) times (P=.045), respectively, in the TRG and from 12.25 (SD 4.19) to 14.68 (SD 4.36) times (P=.003) and from 14.31 (SD 4.04) to 16.25 (SD 4.91) times (P=.01), respectively, in the IRG. The quadriceps femoris EPT increased from 26.19 (SD 10.26) to 35.00 (SD 13.74) Nm (P=.004) in the TRG and from 26.95 (SD 11.81) to 32.74 (SD 12.33) Nm (P=.003) in the IRG. The BBS scores significantly improved in both groups (P<.001), with the mean TRG score increasing by 3.19 (SD 2.86) points and the mean IRG score by 3.06 (SD 2.44) points. Neither group exhibited significant within-group changes on the TUGT or the 6MWT. Both groups reported significant improvements in the IADL (TRG: P=.04; IRG: P=.02). Between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in changes in all indicators.

conclusionsA 4-week remote resistance training program is effective in improving strength, balance, and the IADL in older adults with sarcopenia, with effects comparable to rehabilitation supervised by a physical therapist. Telerehabilitation may be a convenient and effective alternative for older adults with sarcopenia who have limited access to rehabilitation resources.

trial registrationChiCTR 2300071648; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=196313.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSarcopeniaTelerehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleResistance Trainingagingbalancebody compositioncardiorespiratory enduranceelderlygerontologyphysical therapyrandomized controlled trialrehabilitationrehabilitation trainingresistance exercisesarcopeniaself-carestrengthtelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39854716
PMCPMC11806269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.