ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
The Use of AI in Mental Health Services to Support Decision-Making: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in mental health care: a scoping review of reviews.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Sustainability of AI-Assisted Mental Health Intervention: A Review of the Literature from 2020-2025.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- From Personalization to Therapeutic Continuity: Framework for Memory in AI-Powered Mental Health Systems.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- The Effects of Artificial Intelligence in Quality Assessment of Outpatient Mental Health Services on Human Auditors.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
- [When AI is involved in making decisions. Ethical considerations on shared decision-making in psychotherapeutic-psychiatric treatment].Der Nervenarzt · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Model for Mental health Access and service use (CoMMA): A process model for technology-enhanced mental healthcare.Internet interventions · 2026Review
- Exploring Students' Perceptions and Usage of Artificial Intelligence in Supporting Mental Health: A Preliminary Study in Higher Education in Qatar.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Empathic AI for Patient-Centered Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Patient Navigation, Support, and Clinical Practice.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- AI assisted triage of UK patients in mental health care services: a qualitative focus group study of patients' attitudes.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health Monitoring: A Solution for Digital Behavioral Health Care and Education-An Umbrella Review.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Facts label for transparent communication of AI Risks in mental health technology.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The unintended negative consequences of artificial intelligence use for psychologists.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Exploring Body Image Awareness With a Large Language Model-Based Conversational Agent: Qualitative Study With Young Adults.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Healthcare Professionals' perspectives on AI-driven decision support in young adult mental health: an analysis through the lens of a shared decision-making framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Physicians' attitudes and acceptance towards artificial intelligence in medical care: a qualitative study in Germany.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Review
- The role of AI-driven art therapy in supporting autism, mental health, and emotional well-being: An umbrella review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have changed the care processes in mental health, particularly in decision-making support for health care professionals and individuals with mental health problems. AI systems provide support in several domains of mental health, including early detection, diagnostics, treatment, and self-care. The use of AI systems in care flows faces several challenges in relation to decision-making support, stemming from technology, end-user, and organizational perspectives with the AI disruption of care processes.
objectiveThis study aims to explore the use of AI systems in mental health to support decision-making, focusing on 3 key areas: the characteristics of research on AI systems in mental health; the current applications, decisions, end users, and user flow of AI systems to support decision-making; and the evaluation of AI systems for the implementation of decision-making support, including elements influencing the long-term use.
methodsA scoping review of empirical evidence was conducted across 5 databases: PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL. The searches were restricted to peer-reviewed articles published in English after 2011. The initial screening at the title and abstract level was conducted by 2 reviewers, followed by full-text screening based on the inclusion criteria. Data were then charted and prepared for data analysis.
resultsOf a total of 1217 articles, 12 (0.99%) met the inclusion criteria. These studies predominantly originated from high-income countries. The AI systems were used in health care, self-care, and hybrid care contexts, addressing a variety of mental health problems. Three types of AI systems were identified in terms of decision-making support: diagnostic and predictive AI, treatment selection AI, and self-help AI. The dynamics of the type of end-user interaction and system design were diverse in complexity for the integration and use of the AI systems to support decision-making in care processes. The evaluation of the use of AI systems highlighted several challenges impacting the implementation and functionality of the AI systems in care processes, including factors affecting accuracy, increase of demand, trustworthiness, patient-physician communication, and engagement with the AI systems.
conclusionsThe design, development, and implementation of AI systems to support decision-making present substantial challenges for the sustainable use of this technology in care processes. The empirical evidence shows that the evaluation of the use of AI systems in mental health is still in its early stages, with need for more empirically focused research on real-world use. The key aspects requiring further investigation include the evaluation of the use of AI-supported decision-making from human-AI interaction and human-computer interaction perspectives, longitudinal implementation studies of AI systems in mental health to assess the use, and the integration of shared decision-making in AI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.