ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
AI-Driven Innovations for Early Sepsis Detection by Combining Predictive Accuracy With Blood Count Analysis in an Emergency Setting: Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Implementation and Evaluation of AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for early sepsis detection and dynamic prognostication in onco-critical care.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of machine learning pipeline for blood culture outcome prediction on prospectively collected emergency department data.Journal of medical microbiology · 2026Article
- [Application and challenges of the clinical decision support system in hematological diseases].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery: Real-World Deployments and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Progress in sepsis prediction models: from traditional scoring systems to multimodal intelligence and clinical translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Translational Potential and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support for Adults in Intensive Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Infectious Diseases in Older Adults: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine: Challenges Across Diagnostic Imaging, Clinical Decision Support, Surgery, Pathology, and Drug Discovery.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Predicting Periprosthetic Joint Infections.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Reveals the Value of Unconventional T Lymphocytes in Sepsis and Prognosis of Elderly Patients With Severe Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- The Prognostic Value of the CALLY Index in Sepsis: A Composite Biomarker Reflecting Inflammation, Nutrition, and Immunity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis, a critical global health challenge, accounted for approximately 20% of worldwide deaths in 2017. Although the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score standardizes the diagnosis of organ dysfunction, early sepsis detection remains challenging due to its insidious symptoms. Current diagnostic methods, including clinical assessments and laboratory tests, frequently lack the speed and specificity needed for timely intervention, particularly in vulnerable populations such as older adults, intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and those with compromised immune systems. While bacterial cultures remain vital, their time-consuming nature and susceptibility to false negatives limit their effectiveness. Even promising existing machine learning approaches are restricted by reliance on complex clinical factors that could delay results, underscoring the need for faster, simpler, and more reliable diagnostic strategies.
objectiveThis study introduces innovative machine learning models using complete blood count with differential (CBC+DIFF) data-a routine, minimally invasive test that assesses immune response through blood cell measurements, critical for sepsis identification. The primary objective was to implement this model within an artificial intelligence-clinical decision support system (AI-CDSS) to enhance early sepsis detection and management in critical care settings.
methodsThis retrospective study at Tri-Service General Hospital (September to December 2023) analyzed 746 ICU patients with suspected pneumonia-induced sepsis (supported by radiographic evidence and a SOFA score increase of ≥2 points), alongside 746 stable outpatients as controls. Sepsis infection sources were confirmed through positive sputum, blood cultures, or FilmArray results. The dataset incorporated both basic hematological factors and advanced neutrophil characteristics (side scatter light intensity, cytoplasmic complexity, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), with data from September to November used for training and data from December used for validation. Machine learning models, including light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), random forest classifier, and gradient boosting classifier, were developed using CBC+DIFF data and were assessed using metrics such as area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity. The best-performing model was integrated into the AI-CDSS, with its implementation supported through workshops and training sessions.
resultsPathogen identification in ICU patients found 243 FilmArray-positive, 411 culture-positive, and 92 undetected cases, yielding a final dataset of 654 (43.8%) sepsis cases out of 1492 total cases. The machine learning models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with LGBM achieving the highest area under the curve (0.90), followed by the random forest classifier (0.89) and gradient boosting classifier (0.88). The best-performing LGBM model was selected and integrated as the core of our AI-CDSS, which was built on a web interface to facilitate rapid sepsis risk assessment using CBC+DIFF data.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that by providing streamlined predictions using CBC+DIFF data without requiring extensive clinical parameters, the AI-CDSS can be seamlessly integrated into clinical workflows, enhancing rapid, accurate identification of sepsis and improving patient care and treatment timeliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.