SynthesisBlood2025
DDAVP response and its determinants in bleeding disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Route-specific effects of desmopressin on bleeding and hyponatremia after kidney biopsy: meta-analysis of intranasal vs. intravenous administration.Frontiers in nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Allele-selective disruption of pathogenic VWF variants in type 2 von Willebrand disease using CRISPR/Cas9.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Buckle up! Managing surgery in patients with bleeding disorder of unknown cause.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Article
- Article
- A Review of Desmopressin Use in Bleeding Disorders: An Unsung Hero?Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Rewriting the script: gene therapy and genome editing for von Willebrand Disease.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractDesmopressin (1-desamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin [DDAVP]) can be used to prevent or stop bleeding. However, large interindividual variability is observed in DDAVP response and determinants are largely unknown. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to identify the response to DDAVP and the factors that determine DDAVP response in patients. We included studies with patients with any bleeding disorder receiving DDAVP. First and second screening round and risk of bias assessment were performed by independent reviewers. The main outcome was proportion of patients with complete (factor level >50 U/dL) or partial (30-50 U/dL) response to DDAVP. Determinants of response including disease type, age, sex, von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) mutations, and baseline factor levels were investigated. In total, 591 articles were found and 103 were included. Of these, 71 articles (1772 patients) were suitable for the study's definition of response. Meta-analysis showed a pooled response proportion of 0.71 (0.64; 0.78) and a significant difference in response between disease subtypes. For hemophilia A, baseline FVIII activity (FVIII:C) was a borderline significant determinant of response. In patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 1, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF activity, and FVIII:C were significant determinants. A large variation in response was observed for specific mutations in VWF and FVIII. Response to DDAVP varied between disease subtypes and was largely determined by the baseline levels of FVIII:C for hemophilia A and VWF:Ag for VWD. Our findings highlight the significant differences in response and emphasize the need for a standardized response definition and further research into response mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.