ArticlePloS one2025
Interventions to improve health care provider implementation and patient adherence of patients to recommendations on geriatric assessment and management in older adults: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interventions to Improve Clinician Implementation of and Patient Adherence to Recommendations on Geriatric Assessment and Management: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The world population is aging. Comprehensive Geriatric assessment (CGA) has been proven to improve the well-being of older adults. However, evidence suggests not all clinicians implement these recommendations in their practice; nor do all patients adhere to them. Currently, there is no up-to-date review of interventions that can improve older adults' adherence to CGA recommendations and health care provider/clinician implementation of those recommendations. The objective of this scoping review protocol is to describe the methodology of the scoping review with the aim to identify interventions that have been tested to improve adherence to CGA recommendations. We will use the Arksey and O'Malley framework and subsequent extension by Levac and colleagues to complete the scoping review. We searched OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, APA PsychInfo, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception to November 14, 2024, and will include a review of reference lists of included studies. Studies eligible for inclusion are studies of any design that examined one or more interventions aiming to improve clinician implementation of and patient adherence to CGA in any clinical setting. We will use standard methods for study selection, data abstraction, assessment of methodological quality of individual studies, and data synthesis. Results will be analyzed and reported using descriptive numerical summaries and narrative analysis. Findings from the scoping review will be published in a manuscript and presented at scientific conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.