Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854567›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Social mates dynamically coordinate aggressive behavior to produce strategic territorial defense.

Nicole M Moody, Cole M Williams, Sohini Ramachandran, Matthew J Fuxjager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicole M MoodyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8070-921X
Cole M WilliamsCenter for Computational Molecular Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5888-5994
Sohini RamachandranDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9588-7964
Matthew J FuxjagerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-6854

Funding

Population-genetic methods for inferring recent histories and targets of selection in the biobank eraR35GM139628 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Sohini Ramachandran · 2021 to 2026
$2.2M
Predoctoral Training Program in Biological Data Science at Brown UniversityT32GM128596 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAMACHANDRAN, SOHINI, SANDSTEDE, BJORN · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139628NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM128596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negotiating social dynamics among allies and enemies is a complex problem that often requires individuals to tailor their behavioral approach to a specific situation based on environmental and/or social factors. One way to make these contextual adjustments is by arranging behavioral output into intentional patterns. Yet, few studies explore how behavioral patterns vary across a wide range of contexts, or how allies might interlace their behavior to produce a coordinated response. Here, we investigate the possibility that resident female and male downy woodpeckers guard their breeding territories from conspecific intruders by deploying defensive behavior in context-specific patterns. To study whether this is the case, we use correlation networks to reveal how suites of agonistic behavior are interrelated. We find that residents do organize their defense into definable patterns, with female and male social mates deploying their behaviors non-randomly in a correlated fashion. We then employ spectral clustering analyses to further distill these responses into distinct behavioral motifs. Our results show that this population of woodpeckers adjusts the defensive motifs deployed according to threat context. When we combine this approach with behavioral transition analyses, our results reveal that pair coordination is a common feature of territory defense in this species. However, if simulated intruders are less threatening, residents are more likely to defend solo, where only one bird deploys defensive behaviors. Overall, our study supports the hypothesis that nonhuman animals can pattern their behavior in a strategic and coordinated manner, while demonstrating the power of systems approaches for analyzing multiagent behavioral dynamics.

Indexed as

AggressionBirdsTerritorialityAnimalsBehavior, AnimalComputational BiologyFemaleMaleSexual Behavior, AnimalSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID39854567
PMCPMC11785317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.