Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854491›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Genotype x environment interaction effect on grain yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) in Deciduous forest and Sudan savanna ecologies of Ghana.

Francis Kusi, Richard Adu Amoah, Patrick Attamah, Shaibu Alhassan, Damba Yahaya, Justice Frederick Awuku, Jerry A Nbonyine, Isaac Amegbor, Gloria Mensah, Issah Sugri and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Francis KusiCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Richard Adu AmoahCSIR-Plant Genetic Resources Research Institute, Bunso, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-5094-4964
Patrick AttamahCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-7447-4039
Shaibu AlhassanUniversity for Development Studies, Department of Biotechnology, Tamale, Ghana.
Damba YahayaUniversity for Development Studies, Department of Biotechnology, Tamale, Ghana.
Justice Frederick AwukuCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-2567-5699
Jerry A NbonyineCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Isaac AmegborCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-5534
Gloria MensahCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Issah SugriCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Mukhtaru ZakariaCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Salim LaminiCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Peter AsungreCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-0588-2845
Emmanuel Asibi AziibaCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.
Julius YirzaglaCSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-5436
Emmanuel Boamah DukuCSIR-Plant Genetic Resources Research Institute, Bunso, Ghana.
Daniel Ashie KoteyCSIR-Plant Genetic Resources Research Institute, Bunso, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-1816-2473
Isaac AsanteDepartment of Botany, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cowpea is deemed as a food security crop due to its ability to produce significant yields under conditions where other staples fail. Its resilience in harsh environments; such as drought, heat and marginal soils; along with its nitrogen-fixing capabilities and suitability as livestock feed make cowpea a preferred choice in many farming systems across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Despite its importance, Cowpea yields in farmers' fields remain suboptimal, primarily due to biotic and abiotic factors and the use of either unimproved varieties or improved varieties that are not well-suited to local conditions. Multi environment testing of genotypes is essential for recommending varieties suited for either specific or for wide cultivation. This study aimed, to identify and recommend cowpea breeding lines for wide or specific cultivation in the Sudan Savanna and Deciduous Forest zones of Ghana. The research utilized twenty early-maturing advance cowpea breeding lines and three check varieties (released varieties). The experiment was conducted in two locations: Bunso in the Deciduous Forest zone and Manga in the Sudan Savanna zone over 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 cropping seasons. Combined analysis of variance revealed a significant genotype-environment interaction (GEI) which accounted for 35.12% of the variation in yield. The environments were classified into three mega environments, with Bunso_2021 identified as the near-ideal environment where the genotypes exhibited their maximum genetic potentials. In terms of adaption, genotype UG_04 demonstrated broad adaption, showing high yield and stability across all test environments. Genotypes UG_01 and UG_02 performed particularly well in Bunso_2021 and Bunso_2022, while UG_04 and UG_14 excelled in Manga_2021. These findings provide valuable insights for selecting cowpea varieties that can enhance productivity and stability in diverse agro-ecological zones.

Indexed as

Edible GrainGene-Environment InteractionVignaCrops, AgriculturalForestsGenotypeGhanaGrasslandPlant BreedingSudan

Identifiers

PMID39854491
PMCPMC11759354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.