ArticlePloS one2025
Exploring a pico-well based scRNA-seq method (HIVE) for simplified processing of equine bronchoalveolar lavage cells.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Equine endometrial organoids preserve tissue structure and cycle-stage transcriptional identity†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a valuable tool for investigating cellular heterogeneity in diseases such as equine asthma (EA). This study evaluates the HIVE™ scRNA-seq method, a pico-well-based technology, for processing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells from horses with EA. The HIVE method offers practical advantages, including compatibility with both field and clinical settings, as well as a gentle workflow suited for handling sensitive cells. Our results show that the major cell types in equine BAL were successfully identified; however, the proportions of T cells and macrophages deviated from cytological expectations, with macrophages being overrepresented and T cells underrepresented. Despite these limitations, the HIVE method confirmed previously identified T cell and macrophage subpopulations and defined other BAL cell subsets. However, compared to previous studies T helper subsets were less clearly defined. Additionally, consistent with previous scRNA-seq studies, the HIVE method detected fewer granulocytes and mast cells than anticipated in the total BAL samples. Nevertheless, applying the method to purified mast cells recovered an expected number of cells. A small set of eosinophils were also detected which have not been characterized in earlier studies. In summary these findings suggest that while the HIVE method shows promise for certain applications, further optimization is needed to improve the accuracy of cell type representation, particularly for granulocytes and mast cells, in BAL samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.