ArticlePloS one2025
Low-cost and scalable machine learning model for identifying children and adolescents with poor oral health using survey data: An empirical study in Portugal.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This empirical study assessed the potential of developing a machine-learning model to identify children and adolescents with poor oral health using only self-reported survey data. Such a model could enable scalable and cost-effective screening and targeted interventions, optimizing limited resources to improve oral health outcomes. To train and test the model, we used data from 2,133 students attending schools in a Portuguese municipality. Poor oral health (the dependent variable) was defined as having a Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth index for deciduous teeth (dmft) or permanent teeth (DMFT) above expert-defined thresholds (dmft/DMFT ≥ 3 or 4). The survey provided information about the students' oral health habits, knowledge, beliefs, and food and physical activity habits, which served as independent variables. Logistic regression models with variables selected through low-variance filtering and recursive feature elimination outperformed various others trained with complex machine learning algorithms based on precision@k metric, outperforming also random selection and expert rule-based models in identifying students with poor oral health. The proposed models are inherently explainable, broadly applicable, which given the context, could compensate their lower performance (Area Under the Curve = 0.64-0.70) compared to similar approaches and models. This study is one of the few in oral health care that includes bias auditing of classification models. The audit surfaced potential biases related to demographic factors such as age and social assistance status. Addressing these biases without significantly compromising model performance remains a challenge. The results confirm the feasibility of survey-based machine learning models for identifying individuals with poor oral health, but further validation of this approach and pilot testing in field trials are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.