Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854337›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Exploiting the similarity of dissimilarities for biomedical applications and enhanced machine learning.

Mohammad Neamul Kabir, Li Rong Wang, Wilson Wen Bin Goh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad Neamul KabirLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-896X
Li Rong WangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3546-9354
Wilson Wen Bin GohLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

Ministry of Education, Singapore
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "similarity of dissimilarities" is an emerging paradigm in biomedical science with significant implications for protein function prediction, machine learning (ML), and personalized medicine. In protein function prediction, recognizing dissimilarities alongside similarities provides a more detailed understanding of evolutionary processes, allowing for a deeper exploration of regions that influence biological functionality. For ML models, incorporating dissimilarity measures helps avoid misleading results caused by highly correlated or similar data, addressing confounding issues like the Doppelgänger Effect. This leads to more accurate insights and a stronger understanding of complex biological systems. In the realm of personalized AI and precision medicine, the importance of dissimilarities is paramount. Personalized AI builds local models for each sample by identifying a network of neighboring samples. However, if the neighboring samples are too similar, it becomes difficult to identify factors critical to disease onset for the individual, limiting the effectiveness of personalized interventions or treatments. This paper discusses the "similarity of dissimilarities" concept, using protein function prediction, ML, and personalized AI as key examples. Integrating this approach into an analysis allows for the design of better, more meaningful experiments and the development of smarter validation methods, ensuring that the models learn in a meaningful way.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansPrecision MedicineProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID39854337
PMCPMC11759369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.