Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854293›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Predicting vasovagal reactions to needles from video data using 2D-CNN with GRU and LSTM.

Judita Rudokaite, Sharon Ong, Itir Onal Ertugrul, Mart P Janssen, Elisabeth Huis In 't Veld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judita RudokaiteDepartment of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9427-8051
Sharon OngDepartment of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4120-163X
Itir Onal ErtugrulDepartment of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mart P JanssenDonor Medicine Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth Huis In 't VeldDepartment of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When undergoing or about to undergo a needle-related procedure, most people are not aware of the adverse emotional and physical reactions (so-called vasovagal reactions; VVR), that might occur. Thus, rather than relying on self-report measurements, we investigate whether we can predict VVR levels from the video sequence containing facial information measured during the blood donation. We filmed 287 blood donors throughout the blood donation procedure where we obtained 1945 videos for data analysis. We compared 5 different sequences of videos-45, 30, 20, 10 and 5 seconds to test the shortest video duration required to predict VVR levels. We used 2D-CNN with LSTM and GRU to predict continuous VVR scores and to classify discrete (low and high) VVR values obtained during the blood donation. The results showed that during the classification task, the highest achieved F1 score on high VVR class was 0.74 with a precision of 0.93, recall of 0.61, PR-AUC of 0.86 and an MCC score of 0.61 using a pre-trained ResNet152 model with LSTM on 25 frames and during the regression task the lowest root mean square error achieved was 2.56 using GRU on 50 frames. This study demonstrates that it is possible to predict vasovagal responses during a blood donation using facial features, which supports the further development of interventions to prevent VVR.

Indexed as

NeedlesSyncope, VasovagalAdultBlood DonorsFemaleHumansMaleVideo RecordingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39854293
PMCPMC11760633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.