Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854283›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Functional profiling of the sequence stockpile: a protein pair-based assessment of in silico prediction tools.

R Prabakaran, Yana Bromberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R PrabakaranDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0172-3716
Yana BrombergDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8351-0844

Funding

National Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIn silico functional annotation of proteins is crucial to narrowing the sequencing-accelerated gap in our understanding of protein activities. Numerous function annotation methods exist, and their ranks have been growing, particularly so with the recent deep learning-based developments. However, it is unclear if these tools are truly predictive. As we are not aware of any methods that can identify new terms in functional ontologies, we ask if they can, at least, identify molecular functions of proteins that are non-homologous to or far-removed from known protein families.

resultsHere, we explore the potential and limitations of the existing methods in predicting the molecular functions of thousands of such proteins. Lacking the "ground truth" functional annotations, we transformed the assessment of function prediction into evaluation of functional similarity of protein pairs that likely share function but are unlike any of the currently functionally annotated sequences. Notably, our approach transcends the limitations of functional annotation vocabularies, providing a means to assess different-ontology annotation methods. We find that most existing methods are limited to identifying functional similarity of homologous sequences and fail to predict the function of proteins lacking reference. Curiously, despite their seemingly unlimited by-homology scope, deep learning methods also have trouble capturing the functional signal encoded in protein sequence. We believe that our work will inspire the development of a new generation of methods that push boundaries and promote exploration and discovery in the molecular function domain. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data underlying this article are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6737127.v3. The code used to compute siblings is available openly at https://bitbucket.org/bromberglab/siblings-detector/.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinComputer SimulationDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID39854283
PMCPMC11821270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.