SynthesisQJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians2025
Integrated care management for patients following acute stroke: a systematic review.
Synthesis in QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of an ERAS-based care bundle strategy in early rehabilitation care of patients with acute ischemic stroke.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Trial
- Barriers for general practitioners in post-stroke follow-up within a fragmented healthcare system in Sweden - a focus group study.The European journal of general practice · 2026Article
- From disease-specific control to system-embedded governance: a multidimensional policy design analysis of stroke prevention and stroke center development in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association between ALBI score and stroke risk and all-cause mortality: 2011 to 2018 NHANES.Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contemporary stroke care is moving towards more holistic and patient-centred integrated approaches, however, there is need to develop high quality evidence for interventions that benefit patients as part of this approach. This study aims to identify the types of integrated care management strategies that exist for people with stroke, to determine whether stroke management pathways impact patient outcomes and to identify elements of integrated stroke care that were effective at improving outcomes. The study is a systematic review with meta-analysis. The review was conducted using Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of randomized controlled trials from January 2012 to January 2024. Studies that evaluated interventions as part of integrated care against a control or standard treatment group were included. Primary outcomes included mortality, recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, unplanned readmission, anxiety and depression, lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors, and adherence to intervention. In total, 99 studies were included and 63 were meta-analysed. Patients receiving integrated stroke care had significant reductions in recurrent stroke (RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-1.00, P = 0.05, I2 = 39%), significant improvements in quality of life (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.56, P < 0.00001, I2 = 91%) and reduced incidence of depression (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.007, I2 = 22%). There were no significant differences in mortality or major bleeding. The findings of this study show that integrated care post-stroke is associated with better quality of life and reduced depression and recurrent stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.