Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854272›Full record

SynthesisQJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians2025

Integrated care management for patients following acute stroke: a systematic review.

Ian Eustace, Benjamin J R Buckley, Isik Kaya, Katie L Hoad, Madeleine France-Ratcliffe, Andrew M Hill, Gregory Y H Lip, Ian D Jones, Karen Higginbotham

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ian EustaceSchool of Nursing and Advanced Practice, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2862-9551
Benjamin J R BuckleyLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1479-8872
Isik KayaWest Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK.
Katie L HoadCardiovascular Health Sciences, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1266-3269
Madeleine France-RatcliffeCardiovascular Health Sciences, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1239-2545
Andrew M HillMersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2875-0546
Gregory Y H LipLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Ian D JonesSchool of Nursing and Advanced Practice, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3081-0069
Karen HigginbothamSchool of Nursing and Advanced Practice, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0795-7473

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 899871National Institute for Health and Care Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary stroke care is moving towards more holistic and patient-centred integrated approaches, however, there is need to develop high quality evidence for interventions that benefit patients as part of this approach. This study aims to identify the types of integrated care management strategies that exist for people with stroke, to determine whether stroke management pathways impact patient outcomes and to identify elements of integrated stroke care that were effective at improving outcomes. The study is a systematic review with meta-analysis. The review was conducted using Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of randomized controlled trials from January 2012 to January 2024. Studies that evaluated interventions as part of integrated care against a control or standard treatment group were included. Primary outcomes included mortality, recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, unplanned readmission, anxiety and depression, lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors, and adherence to intervention. In total, 99 studies were included and 63 were meta-analysed. Patients receiving integrated stroke care had significant reductions in recurrent stroke (RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-1.00, P = 0.05, I2 = 39%), significant improvements in quality of life (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.56, P < 0.00001, I2 = 91%) and reduced incidence of depression (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, P = 0.007, I2 = 22%). There were no significant differences in mortality or major bleeding. The findings of this study show that integrated care post-stroke is associated with better quality of life and reduced depression and recurrent stroke.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedStrokeHumansQuality of LifeRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39854272
PMCPMC12341757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.