Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854215›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2025

Relevance of body weight adaptation and modern obesity-defining parameters in the analysis of isokinetic trunk strength in people with obesity - A retrospective analysis.

Daniel Geissler, Andreas Lison, Christoph Schulze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel GeisslerOrthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4028-7627
Andreas LisonZentrum für Sportmedizin der Bundeswehr, Warendorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2773-2995
Christoph SchulzeOrthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5715-9210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathologic values of body mass index (BMI), body weight, and waist circumference correlate with higher absolute and lower relative trunk strength. Whether waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is appropriate for showing trunk strength differences in people with obesity and whether a continuous linear relationship exists between the increase in obesity and trunk strength is unknown. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 1174 subjects (1114 men and 60 women). Measured values included body weight, height, waist circumference, WHtR, BMI, and both absolute and body weight-adapted trunk flexor/extensor strength. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Welch tests, Pearson correlations, mixed-linear, and nonlinear regression analyses. Positive correlations with absolute trunk strength were found in subjects without obesity for all anthropometric parameters except WHtR. Weaker positive and partly negative correlation and linear regression coefficients were found in subjects with obesity. Nonlinear relationships were found between age, BMI, WHtR, and absolute respective body weight-adapted trunk strength. The relationship between obesity-defining measures/ indices and trunk strength is non-linear. Increasing BMI, waist circumference, or WHtR above cut-off values known from cardiovascular research is linked to a decrease or weaker increase in trunk strength. Body weight adaptation is recommended to avoid misinterpretation of apparently good absolute trunk strength values in people with obesity.

Indexed as

Body WeightMuscle StrengthObesityTorsoAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesWaist CircumferenceWaist-Height Ratiobody‐weight adaptionobesitytrunk strengthwaist‐to‐height ratio

Identifiers

PMID39854215
PMCPMC12096046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.