ArticleBiometrics2025
Distributed lag models for retrospective cohort data with application to a study of built environment and body weight.
Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distributed lag models (DLMs) estimate the health effects of exposure over multiple time lags prior to the outcome and are widely used in time series studies. Applying DLMs to retrospective cohort studies is challenging due to inconsistent lengths of exposure history across participants, which is common when using electronic health record databases. A standard approach is to define subcohorts of individuals with some minimum exposure history, but this limits power and may amplify selection bias. We propose alternative full-cohort methods that use all available data while simultaneously enabling examination of the longest time lag estimable in the cohort. Through simulation studies, we find that restricting to a subcohort can lead to biased estimates of exposure effects due to confounding by correlated exposures at more distant lags. By contrast, full-cohort methods that incorporate multiple imputation of complete exposure histories can avoid this bias to efficiently estimate lagged and cumulative effects. Applying full-cohort DLMs to a study examining the association between residential density (a proxy for walkability) over 12 years and body weight, we find evidence of an immediate effect in the prior 1-2 years. We also observed an association at the maximal lag considered (12 years prior), which we posit reflects an earlier ($\ge$12 years) or incrementally increasing prior effect over time. DLMs can be efficiently incorporated within retrospective cohort studies to identify critical windows of exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.