Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854093›Full record

ArticleJournal of phycology2025

Asynchronous shifts in the demographics of two wave-swept kelp species (Laminariales) after nearly four decades.

Samuel Starko, Alyssa Allchurch, Christopher Neufeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of phycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel StarkoUWA Oceans Institute & School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9604-9188
Alyssa AllchurchBamfield Marine Sciences Centre, Bamfield, British Columbia, Canada.
Christopher NeufeldBamfield Marine Sciences Centre, Bamfield, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Forrest Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kelp forests are among the most abundant and productive marine ecosystems but are under threat from climate change and other anthropogenic stressors. Although knowledge is growing about how the abundance and distribution of kelp forests are changing, much less is known about the "non-lethal" effects that global change is having on the performance and health of kelp populations in areas where they persist. Here we assessed the age distribution of two common stipitate kelp species, Laminaria setchelli and Pterygophora californica, at Wizard Islet in Barkley Sound, British Columbia, Canada, and compared these data to historical demographic data collected by De Wreede (1984) and Klinger and DeWreede (1988) from the same site between 1981 and 1983. We observed that L. setchelli populations in 2020 were younger and less evenly aged than the same populations sampled nearly four decades prior, while the P. californica population was composed of older individuals on average than at the historical time point. Although the drivers of these demographic changes remain unclear, Barkley Sound has experienced substantial changes in the physical and biological environment over the past decade that could be responsible for these patterns. Given that the size of an individual and its probability of reproduction increases with age, shifting demographics may impact the reproductive output of each population, potentially altering the competitive relationships between co-occurring species. Changes in size distribution may also influence ecosystem-level processes such as habitat complexity or productivity.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeKelpLaminariaBritish ColumbiaEcosystemPopulation Dynamicsage structureglobal changehistorical ecologykelp forestspopulation ecology

Identifiers

PMID39854093
PMCPMC11914948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.