ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2025
Computing 3-Step Theory of Suicide Factor Scores From Veterans Health Administration Clinical Progress Notes.
Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLiterature on how to translate information extracted from clinical progress notes into numeric scores for 3-step theory of suicide (3ST) factors is nonexistent. We determined which scoring option would best discriminate between patients who will attempt or die by suicide and patients with neither suicidal ideation nor attempts, and we tested hypotheses related to the 3ST.
methodsWe used terminology-driven natural language processing (NLP) to extract information from Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinical progress notes. Counts of those extractions served as input to evaluate candidate scoring options for each 3ST factor (psychological pain, hopelessness, connectedness, capability for suicide). Logistic regression models adjusted for common demographic characteristics were used to test the 3ST hypotheses.
resultsOptimal contrasts between groups were obtained with P - A for psychological pain, hopelessness, and capability for suicide, and LIMITATIONS: Additional research is necessary to verify whether our conclusions hold in a cohort that is more reflective of the general VHA population.
conclusionTerminology-driven 3ST factor scores discriminate patients who attempt or die by suicide from patients without suicidal ideation or attempts. Our results corroborate the validity of the 3ST for VHA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.