Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39854032›Full record

ArticleMedical education2025

Tolerance for uncertainty and medical students' specialty choices: A myth revisited.

Odette Wegwarth, Moritz Pfoch, Claudia Spies, Martin Möckel, Stefan J Schaller, Markus Wehler, Helge Giese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Uncertainty in general practice: a myth of uniqueness?Family medicine and community health · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Odette WegwarthHeisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy and Evidence-Based Decisions, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0885-2673
Moritz PfochHeisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy and Evidence-Based Decisions, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia SpiesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin MöckelDepartment of Emergency Medicine with Chest Pain Units, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan J SchallerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6683-9584
Markus WehlerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Helge GieseHeisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy and Evidence-Based Decisions, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 445297764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 1962, the idea emerged that medical students' tolerance of uncertainty could determine their specialty choice. While some studies supported this claim, others refuted it, often using independently developed instruments. We explored whether the reported link between specialty choice and uncertainty tolerance is more myth than evidence by employing established instruments to investigate whether specialty choice could be explained by variance in uncertainty tolerance.

methodWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey at two periods of time. From February to June 2023, we queried 563 final-year medical students from 34 German medical universities (1) on their uncertainty tolerance using three validated tools (the modified tolerance for ambiguity scale, the physicians' reaction to uncertainty scale and the uncertainty intolerance scenario method) and (2) on their intended specialty choice. In a follow-up 1 year later (May to June 2024), 263 of those medical students responded to our query on their final specialty choice and again on their uncertainty tolerance.

resultsParticipants' (N = 563) median age was 26.0 years (mean: 27.2; SD = 3.8), and 70% (n = 396) were female. Originally reported differences and rank orders in uncertainty tolerance among medical students with different intended specialty choices could not be replicated for any of the three scales. Instead, our results suggest different rank orders of uncertainty tolerance by different tools, as well as nonsignificant differences between intended medical specialties. Intercorrelation coefficient analyses demonstrated that, depending on the scale, only 0.3% to 1.5% of the variance in uncertainty tolerance could be attributed to specialty choice. Follow-up data using actual instead of intended medical choices left findings unchanged. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that the presumed link between uncertainty tolerance and specialty choice is more myth than evidence. Instead of teaching this link or using it as an admissions criterion, medical schools should equip students with the skills needed to navigate uncertainty across their careers.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceSpecializationStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUncertaintyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39854032
PMCPMC12242894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.