ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025
New Zealand Early Learning Service Menus Do Not Meet Health New Zealand Guidelines for Providing Healthy Menus and Reducing Food-Related Choking in Children.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are childcare settings' food menus fit for purpose? A qualitative analysis in England.Health promotion international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess alignment of food and drinks served to New Zealand (NZ) children in early learning services (ELS) with the Health NZ (formerly known as Ministry of Health) Healthy Food and Drink (HFD) and Reducing Food Related Choking (choking) guidance.
methodsMenus (271) collected remotely from 148 ELS from November 2020-March 2021 were analysed for their nutritional quality based on a 'traffic light' classification of 'green' (most nutritious), 'amber' (moderately nutritious) and 'red' (least nutritious) based on the guidance.
resultsOverall, 2.6% of menus met the guidance, and alignment was greater for menus for over 2-year-olds (over-2s) than under 2-year-olds (under-2s; p < 0.01). One-fifth (18.5%) of menus met the choking guidance. Services with a Healthy Heart Award (HHA) from the Heart Foundation provided more 'green' items to over-2s (p = 0.039) and under-2s (p = 0.01), and less 'red' items to over-2s (p = 0.04). Providing more green menu items was inversely correlated with providing less high choking risk foods (p < 0.01). Menu scores did not vary by service location, neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation or type (services operating independently versus those part of an education group chain).
conclusionsAlignment with Health NZ nutritional guidance is low, particularly in ELS caring for very young children (under-2s). Service characteristics, except for HHA status, are a poor predictor of nutritional quality of menus at ELS. SO WHAT: Greater uptake of the HHA scheme could assist ELS to provide healthier food and drinks. Early learning services need further support from the public health sector to implement national nutritional guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.