Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39853981›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in PDGFRA-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Maria Concetta Nigro, Andrea Marchetti, Elena Rosa Fumagalli, Ida De Luca, Alexia Francesca Bertuzzi, Maria Susanna Grimaudo, Giovanni Grignani, Lorenzo D'Ambrosio, Alessandra Merlini, Giuseppe Badalamenti and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Maria Concetta NigroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea MarchettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Elena Rosa FumagalliMedical Oncology Unit 2, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Ida De LucaMedical Oncology Unit 2, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Alexia Francesca BertuzziDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Maria Susanna GrimaudoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Giovanni GrignaniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Lorenzo D'AmbrosioDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alessandra MerliniCandiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte-IRCCS, Candiolo (Turin), Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe BadalamentiDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Lorena IncorvaiaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Alessandra DiminoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Silvia GasperoniDepartment of Oncology, Clinical Oncology Unit, University Hospital Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Bruno VincenziDepartment of Medical Oncology, Campus Biomedico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Stefano FantiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro Di FedericoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Davide CampanaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maria Abbondanza PantaleoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Margherita NanniniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Tumori Rari Bologna

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The D842V platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) mutation identifies a molecular subgroup of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), primarily resistant to standard tyrosine kinase inhibitors and with an overall more indolent behavior. Although functional imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-labeled positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) plays a proven role in GISTs, especially in early assessment of tumor response, less is known about [18F]FDG uptake according to the GIST molecular subtypes. Objective: To evaluate the degree of [18F]FDG uptake in PDGFRA-mutant GISTs and better define the role of functional imaging in this rare and peculiar subset of GISTs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study involving 7 GIST reference centers in Italy included patients with PDGFRA-mutant GIST who underwent [18F]FDG-PET from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2023. Data on the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary tumor or metastatic disease were collected. Exposure: PDGFRA-mutant GIST and [18F]FDG-PET. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was the degree of [18F]FDG uptake of PDGFRA-mutant GISTs, with a focus on the D842V-mutant subgroup. Secondary objectives were to assess the association between the degree of [18F]FDG uptake and main clinicopathologic features. Results: A total of 71 patients with PDGFRA-mutant GISTs were included in the analysis: 37 (52.1%) in the D842V subgroup (group A) and 34 (47.9%) in the non-D842V subgroup (group B). Additionally, 70 patients with KIT exon 11-mutant GIST served as a control group (group C). For all 141 participants, the median age at diagnosis was 59 (range, 26-89) years, and 81 patients (57.4%) were male. Overall, the median SUVmax was 4.4 (IQR, 0-10.1), while the median SUVmax for group A was 0 (IQR, 0-3.2); for group B, 3.6 (IQR, 0-5.1); and for group C, 10.1 (IQR, 5.1-13.9). The median SUVmax of PDGFRA-mutant GISTs was significantly lower than the median value of KIT exon 11-mutant GISTs (0 [IQR, 0-4.3] vs 10.1 [IQR, 5.1-14.0]; P < .001). Median [18F]FDG uptake was significantly lower in the D842V subgroup compared with the non-D842V subgroup (0 [IQR, 0-3.2] vs 3.6 [IQR, 0-5.1]; P = .02). Moreover, the triad of gastric primary tumor, tumor size greater than 10 cm, and SUVmax of 5.75 or less was associated with identification of PDGFRA-mutant GISTs. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with PDGFRA-mutant GISTs, the D842V-mutant GISTs were associated with an overall lower [18F]FDG uptake compared with other GIST subgroups. Therefore, the role of functional imaging with [18F]FDG-PET in this subset of GISTs may be limited and should be further explored for its potential prognostic and predictive value.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedMutationPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha

Identifiers

PMID39853981
PMCPMC11762236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.