ArticleJAMA network open2025
Neonatal Nutrition and Brain Structure at 7 Years in Children Born Very Preterm.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Maternal Angiogenic Markers in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Neonatal Growth and Body Composition.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Fat-free mass is associated with neurodevelopment outcomes in extremely preterm infants up to 3 years of age.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Parietal thickness predicts middle temporal area (V5) motion responses in 7-year-old children born very preterm.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Amino acids and lean mass accretion in preterm neonates.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026Review
- Recommended nutrition for preterm infants-on track, but more research is needed.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Effects of Early Nutrition on Premature Infants.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Higher in-hospital proportion of breast milk intake improves brain functional connectivity and neurological assessment in preterm infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Neonatal protein intake following very preterm birth has long lasting effects on brain development. However, it is uncertain whether these effects are associated with improved or impaired brain maturation. Objective: To assess the association of neonatal protein intake following very preterm birth with brain structure at 7 years of age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study involved children born very preterm before or after a change in neonatal intensive care unit nutritional protocol that increased protein intake at the National Women's Hospital in Auckland, New Zealand. The children completed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning at 7 years. There were 128 children who were initially eligible. MRI data were ineligible for analysis if excessive head motion or clinical brain abnormalities were present. Data were collected from July 2012 to January 2016, and data analysis took place from January 2017 to March 2024. Exposure: Neonatal intensive care unit nutritional protocol. Those who were born before the protocol change took place (July 2005 to December 2006) were in the old protocol group, while those who were born after the protocol change (January 2007 to October 2008) were in the new protocol group. Observers were blind to participant grouping. Main Outcomes and Measures: All actual enteral and parenteral intakes of protein, fat, energy, and breast milk for days 1 to 7 and days 1 to 14, and growth velocity to postnatal day 28 were calculated for each infant. Preplanned outcomes were group comparisons between regional brain volumes and diffusion parameters of major white matter tracts along with analyses with both groups combined exploring associations of nutrition with brain metrics. Results: Data from 99 children were analyzed, including 42 in the old protocol group (26 female [55%]; mean [SD] gestational age at birth, 27 [2] weeks) and 57 in the new protocol group (27 female [47%]; mean [SD] gestational age at birth, 26 [2] weeks). Protein intake differed between the groups at both 7 days (old protocol: mean [SD] intake, 17 [2] g/kg-1; new protocol: mean [SD] intake, 21 [2] g/kg-1) and 14 days after birth (old protocol: mean [SD] intake, 41 [6] g/kg-1; new protocol: mean [SD] intake, 45 [7] g/kg-1). The new protocol group had smaller brain volume as a percentage of intercranial volume than the old protocol group (mean [SD], 80% [4%] vs 86% [7%]) but absolute brain volumes were similar. The new protocol group had significantly thinner lateral occipital and lateral parietal cortices than the old protocol group. With both groups combined, those with greater protein, fat, energy, and breast milk intake had more mature diffusion tensor metrics (higher fractional anisotropy and less diffusion) across multiple tracts, although this finding did not reach statistical significance for every tract. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort of children born very preterm, children with greater neonatal protein intake had a more mature profile of brain metrics assessed with MRI at 7 years of age. These results contribute to the ongoing evaluation of optimal nutrition for infants born very preterm and suggest that the protein intake experienced by the new protocol group may promote brain maturation in a way that is still observable at 7 years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.